If Leclerc buttoned up and beat Sainz in Australia and Japan like he is expected to, we would be have having a different discussion.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:46Except the car is still not there in terms of pure pace and there is no guarantee it will be from Imola onwards.
Constructors might be on the table if Checo does not make a step, that's about as much of a title mount as there will be.
In what way woiuld the discussion be different? Australia is a big what if because Max didn't finish. I don't think he would've been quick enough to trouble Max today, potentially Checo but not Max.AR3-GP wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:55If Leclerc buttoned up and beat Sainz in Australia and Japan like he is expected to, we would be have having a different discussion.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:46Except the car is still not there in terms of pure pace and there is no guarantee it will be from Imola onwards.
Constructors might be on the table if Checo does not make a step, that's about as much of a title mount as there will be.
Even getting Checo would have been very tough by starting behind Norris.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 22:00In what way? Australia ita big what if because Max didn't finish. I don't think he would've been quick enough to trouble Max today, definitely Checo but not Max.AR3-GP wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:55If Leclerc buttoned up and beat Sainz in Australia and Japan like he is expected to, we would be have having a different discussion.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:46
Except the car is still not there in terms of pure pace and there is no guarantee it will be from Imola onwards.
Constructors might be on the table if Checo does not make a step, that's about as much of a title mount as there will be.
Max did not finish in Australia, but Sainz and Leclerc did. I'm only speaking from the perspective of maximizing points on Leclerc's side.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 22:00In what way? Australia ita big what if because Max didn't finish. I don't think he would've been quick enough to trouble Max today, definitely Checo but not Max.AR3-GP wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:55If Leclerc buttoned up and beat Sainz in Australia and Japan like he is expected to, we would be have having a different discussion.scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:46
Except the car is still not there in terms of pure pace and there is no guarantee it will be from Imola onwards.
Constructors might be on the table if Checo does not make a step, that's about as much of a title mount as there will be.
It's not on the table, in 4 races Checo did as much as he could with the car he had. Ferrari need at least 5 tenths from Imola upgrade to mount a consistent challenge on every track in the following 18 races. Yes, plenty of races and plenty of points, but does this half-a-second-step sound real?scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:46Constructors might be on the table if Checo does not make a step, that's about as much of a title mount as there will be.
It's only after Imola that we will know the real trajectories so I definitely think this claim is premature.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 22:07It's not on the table, in 4 races Checo did as much as he could with the car he had. Ferrari need at least 5 tenths from Imola upgrade to mount a consistent challenge on every track in the following 18 races. Yes, plenty of races and plenty of points, but does this half-a-second-step sound real?scuderiabrandon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 21:46Constructors might be on the table if Checo does not make a step, that's about as much of a title mount as there will be.
Vasseur was clear - multiple wins are the goal this year. WCC fight (just a fight) if they are lucky. WDC is not even considered... Both titles are Red Bull's to lose
That's because there was a major flaw in the base floor spec which was unexpected, so i didn't include it.
It's pure wishful thinking at this point. Red Bull is still really far ahead overall(seriously, Max is just out there cruising most of the time, so judging laptimes against him isn't representative of full gap). I know there's been some 'hyping' of the extent of the Imola upgrades, but realistically, it would require another transformative level of improvement to really be capable of fighting for wins on a weekly basis. Team is doing great this year, but it's very unlikely.
To me it looked like they maxed out the medium tire and maybe even overdid it somewhat, so you are right if they missed out on anything it would be the last stint on hards but can't be all that much left in it, from LEC's perspective anyway.SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑07 Apr 2024, 22:39Again, looking at the last stint, I think Ferrari go too conservative with Charles. That's 3 out of 4 races that it feels like the tyre wasn't totally used to perfection.