Well, I appreciate the honesty, stewards will choose what they want. Ultimately Carlos finished the race where he should have, and got lucky to escape a penalty.TFSA wrote:If contact happens while the inside car is on the kerb, it's generally not a divebomb, unless the car runs insanely wide afterwards or it's a hairpin corner. A divebomb is where the inside driver misjudges his braking point and goes wide of the apex. Fernando definitely hit the apex - they only went wide because of the contact. And if the contact is because Sainz closed the door, then Fernando can't be judged at fault for running him wide, because the running wide was caused by the contact causing loss of grip (for both drivers).dialtone wrote: ↑20 Apr 2024, 07:56You can’t judge this incident via picture but if you insist… he’s behind in this picture, so by rule he needs to stay in his lane as Sainz is entitled to the space as long as he leaves enough for Alonso.
Alonso’s follow up, which is the important part after having established that he’s behind, is to force Sainz off track with contact, which he caused by diving in a corner he could never make in that position.
Easy penalty, as easy as the one Sainz deserves for pushing out, with contact, Leclerc later on.
On the other hand ALO was passed very cleanly by Sainz in a nice fight that didn’t involve pushing Alonso wide or off track in any corner, in fact Sainz was the outside car for most of that fight.
Racing incidents are a different thing and don’t involve dive bombing.
Let's see what the stewards say, but to me, your interpretation is completely wrong. It's a completely legitimate move by Alonso. Sainz closed the door.
The small contact they had a few corners before that was more on Alonso. He didn't hit the apex there.
EDIT: Also, I'm not just judging by the image. The image i posted for show-and-tell, but i watched the incident several times. And i can't see Fernando being predominantly to blame for the 2nd contact.
EDIT 2: After watching it again, Fernando might actually have not hit the apex completely, but still just enough to it not being a divebomb. I still think that they wouldn't have gone wide if there hadn't been contact, and therefore I'm still gonna call racing incident. But maybe Fernando is not as innocent as i thought.
Racing is dead. F1 should rename itself scalextrics drs championship.CaribouBread wrote: ↑20 Apr 2024, 08:4110 sec penalty and 3 penalty points for Alonso, the penalty points seem a bit excessive to me but looks like its the new protocol with penalty points.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLlqeYXXYAA ... =4096x4096
Too bad they didn't state the reasoning for their decision. I really don't get the logic here. He's alongside, he's on the kurb, he had - at best - minor understeer, and the collission happens way before they run wide.CaribouBread wrote: ↑20 Apr 2024, 08:4110 sec penalty and 3 penalty points for Alonso, the penalty points seem a bit excessive to me but looks like its the new protocol with penalty points.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GLlqeYXXYAA ... =4096x4096
“Excuses” said the guy who was talking about temps being an issue yesterday when his forgot how to drive while having a car over 1 second faster as we saw in the Sprint…