Maybe that’s how Toto thinks after he let Lewis slip through, but this is also marketing, not just 0.2s.ringo wrote:150 Million is a waste of money on a driver. A driver can give 2 tenths over another faster driver, New tools and engineering can give 1.5 seconds.
Or Totto can pay himself to not be Principal and take a 2 year vacation for that money.
Yeah I think a huge part of the value here will come from marketing. I read somewhere that the team is set to lose quite a bit of market value with the departure of Lewis. Getting another multiple world champion on board will help fix that and will be worth way more than the 150M.dialtone wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 04:18Maybe that’s how Toto thinks after he let Lewis slip through, but this is also marketing, not just 0.2s.ringo wrote:150 Million is a waste of money on a driver. A driver can give 2 tenths over another faster driver, New tools and engineering can give 1.5 seconds.
Or Totto can pay himself to not be Principal and take a 2 year vacation for that money.
All things being equal I think even 2 tenths is exaggerated.
Max does not have the same pull as Hamilton. No one outside of F1 and Holland knows what a Max Verstappen is.e30ernest wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 04:21Yeah I think a huge part of the value here will come from marketing. I read somewhere that the team is set to lose quite a bit of market value with the departure of Lewis. Getting another multiple world champion on board will help fix that and will be worth way more than the 150M.dialtone wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 04:18Maybe that’s how Toto thinks after he let Lewis slip through, but this is also marketing, not just 0.2s.ringo wrote:150 Million is a waste of money on a driver. A driver can give 2 tenths over another faster driver, New tools and engineering can give 1.5 seconds.
Or Totto can pay himself to not be Principal and take a 2 year vacation for that money.
Imagine +0.2 vs Russel. Now that would be really shocking for 150 million vs Russel's 10 million.
The issue is Max is not, nor ever has been, marketable. And Max will be the first to admit that. This is why Lewis still is the face of F1 for years even during this period of Merc not knowing how to build a car. He is still the most globally recognizable than any other driver. A markerter's dream come true.e30ernest wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 04:21Yeah I think a huge part of the value here will come from marketing. I read somewhere that the team is set to lose quite a bit of market value with the departure of Lewis. Getting another multiple world champion on board will help fix that and will be worth way more than the 150M.dialtone wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 04:18Maybe that’s how Toto thinks after he let Lewis slip through, but this is also marketing, not just 0.2s.ringo wrote:150 Million is a waste of money on a driver. A driver can give 2 tenths over another faster driver, New tools and engineering can give 1.5 seconds.
Or Totto can pay himself to not be Principal and take a 2 year vacation for that money.
He's probably winning races though with a step similar to what McLaren made in Austria last year.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 01:51Someone has bought into the "driver outperforms his car" idea.stonehenge wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 01:46Not saying $150 million a year isn't an absurd amount of money, BUT:
The value of getting Verstappen is *not only* him driving for you, it's also him *not driving for Red Bull*!
Verstappen is not only the best driver, meaning you boost your chances of winning, but without him, Red Bull's chances of winning are significantly reduced. In other words, getting Verstappen from Red Bull immediately and significantly increases your chances to win (this is true for all teams, not just Mercedes, btw.)
Given that the top teams used to spend like 400-500 million pre cost cap, spending that much on Verstappen is the easiest way of significantly increasing your chances to win while staying under the cost cap. It's an absurd amount of money, but that doesn't mean it's not smart or economically sound.
No point paying $100m for a driver if the car is not good enough. The Red Bull is half a second or more quicker than the rest - that's simple physics. No driver can go faster than the car is able to go, doesn't matter who it is. All the best drivers do is get closer to the car's pace and they do it consistently.
Max in the Merc isn't winning titles.
Hasn't he also spoken about himself and his father starting their own racing team at some stage? You're right in saying he won't stay in F1 long. Maybe they have other plans.
The reason for Max to move as soon as next year would be to bring/attract a few people from Red Bull in a hope of rebuilding the chassis team for 2026 and making the 26 car competitive. Also to get along with the team, learn the procedures, settle in, etc. Bishop for a Queen move, basicallyPlatinumZealot wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 09:38The Dutch are too straight forward to jump to a team lead by an over promising and under delivering team prinicpal. They know the depth of RedBull first hand and whoever is left after Newey goes is still better than the incumbents at Mercedes.
Very difficult to do considering the work on the 2026 chassis will start as early as January 2025 if there are no delays.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 10:00The reason for Max to move as soon as next year would be to bring/attract a few people from Red Bull in a hope of rebuilding the chassis team for 2026 and making the 26 car competitive. Also to get along with the team, learn the procedures, settle in, etc. Bishop for a Queen move, basicallyPlatinumZealot wrote: ↑02 May 2024, 09:38The Dutch are too straight forward to jump to a team lead by an over promising and under delivering team prinicpal. They know the depth of RedBull first hand and whoever is left after Newey goes is still better than the incumbents at Mercedes.
Yes, which is why I said "in a hope of..."