I was sooooo right about the shorter wheel base (postings of a few months back).
lewis ran it in FP1.
nudger wrote:I was sooooo right about the shorter wheel base (postings of a few months back).
lewis ran it in FP1.
Sure it wasn't that you changed the aspect ratio of your TV to squeeze the picture ?ISLAMATRON wrote:nudger wrote:I was sooooo right about the shorter wheel base (postings of a few months back).
lewis ran it in FP1.
more info please, dont hold out on us
Damn! I'm quite the fool!PNSD wrote:Nice picture but wrong car :p.
Pictured is the Ferrari.
Did the endplates previously extend that far down? Also note the nice little winglets inboard of the hub assembly. Nice.
the new front nose facilitates the revised front suspension layout which provides a shorter wheelbase. the purpose so i understand is to get more weight bias to the front.richard_leeds wrote:Sure it wasn't that you changed the aspect ratio of your TV to squeeze the picture ?ISLAMATRON wrote:nudger wrote:I was sooooo right about the shorter wheel base (postings of a few months back).
lewis ran it in FP1.
more info please, dont hold out on us
well, moving the front wheels back in itself shifts the weight forwardroost89 wrote:The shorter wheelbase care is 0.2s faster at the most and Brundle is guessing it's 7.5cm shorter. The wheelbase in itself isn't making it faster, it's the ballast placement within the car that it allows (more forward weight)