was it a development problem then?n smikle wrote:There was an article on this site with Button saying that BrawnGP figured out what caused the problem, but they will not reveal what it is.
was it a development problem then?n smikle wrote:There was an article on this site with Button saying that BrawnGP figured out what caused the problem, but they will not reveal what it is.
n smikle wrote:There was an article on this site with Button saying that BrawnGP figured out what caused the problem, but they will not reveal what it is.
They where faster on the straights because they had better traction as a result of being kinder to their tyres. Their setup & geometry is perfect for hot harsh conditions.mstar wrote:its definately worth noting as people noted here, the brawn seems to be faster in a straight line now that could be due to aero/reduced drag or simply wing levels either way i dnt recall brawns being this fast in race conditions on the striahgt.
Tom, perhaps with your real world experience you could enlighten us? (Im just an armchair speculator)Jersey Tom wrote:The conjecture is staggering...
djos wrote:Tom, perhaps with your real world experience you could enlighten us? (Im just an armchair speculator)Jersey Tom wrote:The conjecture is staggering...
Forceful? It's just my opinion based on my observations - I'll be disappointed if im wrong and surprised but considering all the results to date I doubt I am wrong.gcdugas wrote:djos wrote:Tom, perhaps with your real world experience you could enlighten us? (Im just an armchair speculator)Jersey Tom wrote:The conjecture is staggering...
For a speculator your assertion about the Spa outcome sounded rather forceful. I think that is what Jersey Tom was commenting as "staggering".
If the outcome is any different than Red Bull walking away from Brawn, will you have the humility to recant or will you make excuses?
BTW, if Red Bull does walk away from Brawn, you can all tell us: "I told you so." OK, its a deal.
We have just a few days to find out the results... and what kind of a man you are.
Let the countdown begin.
I believe the hungarian GP was also quite hot, and the Brawns also struggled there. I really think this last victory has more to do with understanding and getting the most out of the car as well as the new updates and tweaks coming through.djos wrote:
Forceful? It's just my opinion based on my observations - I'll be disappointed if im wrong and surprised but considering all the results to date I doubt I am wrong.
Valencia was a perfect example of how well the Brawn BGP001 works in hot harsh conditions and so far they have struggled in cool conditions because they where unable to get enuf heat in their tyres (Silverstone anyone?).
That is true however I put that down to Brawn taking a wrong direction and then reverting to what they knew worked for Valencia:Vasco wrote:I believe the hungarian GP was also quite hot, and the Brawns also struggled there. I really think this last victory has more to do with understanding and getting the most out of the car as well as the new updates and tweaks coming through.
Those new sidepod panels should help with aero efficiency at the rear since they smooth out the airflow around the sidepods. As a result, my guess would be that they would end up being stronger than expected in SPA.
Ross Brawn: "We've had a good start to the weekend today with two strong practice sessions. The track temperatures are very high here, reaching 50°C this afternoon, so we have been able to manage our tyre temperatures well and not encounter the issues which have hampered our pace at the past few races. Both drivers followed very similar programmes as we revisited some set-ups from previous races as test items to increase our understanding of the car's performance. The initial feedback is that Jenson and Rubens are broadly in agreement on the direction that we should follow from here. and we've pleased to have collected so much data to apply here and take onto the next race in Spa. Overall it's been a positive beginning to the weekend."