2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 11:10
Vanja #66 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 08:59
FW17 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 04:46
Floor running closer to road will be more efficient and less prone to turbulence in close running rather than one that is 50 mm off the ground (assumption)
Less turbulence ingested depends a lot on how high the leading edge is and how the flow ahead of and around the leading edge behaves, with all the bodywork and front wheels ahead etc. Non-stepped floor, being very low, is also prone to scraping the ground in roll and thus accidentally getting sealed off, meaning unpredictable downforce levels in corners
In the years I watched F1 I never saw a car loosing control because the floor hit the ground
How do you know what caused all of the various spins over the years?
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 11:10
In the years I watched F1 I never saw a car loosing control because the floor hit the ground
A lot of times W13 had a snap oversteer the rear floor corner was touching the ground, famous examples are both drivers crashing in Austria Q. SF-23, Leclerc Q3 lap in Miami as well, that was a well documented example. These are just recent examples obviously

Image

***
A very decent overhead comparison on current and 2026 cars

Image

Front wing tip will be 100mm shorter, but the massive overhang is due to the double-stage crash structure of the nose. I think they are going too far with safety at this point, the wing has almost a 0.5m gap between trailing edge and front tyre
Last edited by Vanja #66 on 20 Jun 2024, 11:42, edited 1 time in total.
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 11:38
FW17 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 11:10
In the years I watched F1 I never saw a car loosing control because the floor hit the ground
A lot of times W13 had a snap oversteer the rear floor corner was touching the ground, famous examples are both drivers crashing in Austria Q. SF-23, Leclerc Q3 lap in Miami as well, that was a well documented example. These are just recent examples obviously

https://i.postimg.cc/jjNrJ3yw/IMG-0425.jpg
Was talking about flat floors from 1983 to 1994

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 11:40
Was talking about flat floors from 1983 to 1994
Senna, Imola 1994? :shock:
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

mzso
mzso
65
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
19 Jun 2024, 07:46
deadhead wrote:
18 Jun 2024, 21:11
https://ibb.co/3k7jLBH
They should at least go full flat bottom without the 50mm step and keep only the 10 mm plank for ride height control.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FE_UDfxXIAQS7t_.jpg
They should go full floor downforce from front to back, with no wings. Guide and ingest all the air in the middle, and expel it all in the diffuser. Keep the sides rigid and with a good gap from the ground.
Dispose of the skidplate, and make the bottom slightly curved, so getting closer to the ground wouldn't bring extra downforce.
Prevent teams from creating extra vortices. Add elements to reduce wake turbulence, similar to airplane wingtip devices.

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 11:47
FW17 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 11:40
Was talking about flat floors from 1983 to 1994
Senna, Imola 1994? :shock:
So a 10 mm plank will do the job of preventing that, Why do we need the 50mm

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

FW17 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 12:08
So a 10 mm plank will do the job of preventing that, Why do we need the 50mm
Why are we spinning in circles? :? I gave you examples of cars with boat section step and limited roll (due to stiff suspension) losing control when floor edge touches the ground not an hour ago
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

wuzak
wuzak
467
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

TeamKoolGreen wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 06:55
wuzak wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 02:43
TeamKoolGreen wrote:
19 Jun 2024, 22:57
We had flat bottoms for years. And it results in the following car burning its tires off , creating gaps and terrible racing. That everyone seems to have forgotten about. And there was lots of different changes to try and mitigate it. None worked.
I don't recall there being talk of "burning the tyres off", except in the recent past with Pirelli.

Before that it was a matter of the following car losing downforce and teh balance of downforce front to rear.
It happened constantly in 2021 between Max and LH.

Here is a quote from Sainz .

Driver’s view – Carlos Sainz: “It’s surface overheating especially. It’s the thing that as soon as you are behind a car and you lose a bit of traction, a bit of braking grip, you start slipping the tyre and that extra slip means the next corner you have less grip, the next corner you have a bit less grip and you are only able to follow for one or two laps and then you have to back off.”
I'm thinking that the problem wasn't as bad, or didn't exist, before Pirelli.

User avatar
jjn9128
778
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 11:38

A very decent overhead comparison on current and 2026 cars

https://cdn-4.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... mpari.webp

Front wing tip will be 100mm shorter, but the massive overhang is due to the double-stage crash structure of the nose. I think they are going too far with safety at this point, the wing has almost a 0.5m gap between trailing edge and front tyre
Except the floor is gonna be 150mm narrower according to FiA.
- Designed to be smaller and lighter than the current generation of cars, the dimensions of the car have been altered to adhere to the ‘nimble car’ concept at the heart of the new rules. The wheelbase drops from a maximum of 3600mm to 3400mm, while the width has been reduced from 2000mm to 1900mm. The maximum floor width will be reduced by 150mm.
FiA press release.
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

User avatar
Vanja #66
1572
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

jjn9128 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 14:30
Except the floor is gonna be 150mm narrower according to FiA.
- Designed to be smaller and lighter than the current generation of cars, the dimensions of the car have been altered to adhere to the ‘nimble car’ concept at the heart of the new rules. The wheelbase drops from a maximum of 3600mm to 3400mm, while the width has been reduced from 2000mm to 1900mm. The maximum floor width will be reduced by 150mm.
FiA press release.
I thought it remains at 1500mm width like today? Or do I have today's floor width wrong? :oops:
AeroGimli.x

And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

mzso
mzso
65
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

TeamKoolGreen wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 06:47
George Russell called for active suspension in 2022. He was probably right. Then the tunnel floor cars wouldn't have to be so stiff and low.

Active suspension was taken out due to cost but if the components were made spec , it would be cheap and easy
Cost is an excuse. Doubly now that there is a cost cap, they would simply take away the cost from aero. The issues were solved decades ago, manufacturers have been using active suspension in road cars on occasion.

mzso
mzso
65
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

jjn9128 wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 14:30
- Designed to be smaller and lighter than the current generation of cars, the dimensions of the car have been altered to adhere to the ‘nimble car’ concept at the heart of the new rules. The wheelbase drops from a maximum of 3600mm to 3400mm, while the width has been reduced from 2000mm to 1900mm. The maximum floor width will be reduced by 150mm.
FiA press release.
This is such a funny quote. We are a meter and 100kg away from nimble.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
643
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

mzso wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 14:47
TeamKoolGreen wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 06:47
George Russell called for active suspension in 2022. He was probably right. Then the tunnel floor cars wouldn't have to be so stiff and low.
Active suspension was taken out due to cost but if the components were made spec , it would be cheap and easy
Cost is an excuse. Doubly now that there is a cost cap, they would simply take away the cost from aero. The issues were solved decades ago, manufacturers have been using active suspension in road cars on occasion.
active suspension limited and policed how ?
(to stop it being a driver aid equivalent to 'active warping' etc - catching the car quicker than most F1 drivers)

aren't we still waiting for further rules on active aero ?
(and at least AA would be visible)

mzso
mzso
65
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Tommy Cookers wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 15:55
mzso wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 14:47
TeamKoolGreen wrote:
20 Jun 2024, 06:47
George Russell called for active suspension in 2022. He was probably right. Then the tunnel floor cars wouldn't have to be so stiff and low.
Active suspension was taken out due to cost but if the components were made spec , it would be cheap and easy
Cost is an excuse. Doubly now that there is a cost cap, they would simply take away the cost from aero. The issues were solved decades ago, manufacturers have been using active suspension in road cars on occasion.
active suspension limited and policed how ?
(to stop it being a driver aid equivalent to 'active warping' etc - catching the car quicker than most F1 drivers)

aren't we still waiting for further rules on active aero ?
(and at least AA would be visible)
What's the problem with that? It tries to keep the car as stable as possible. It won't catch the car is the rear goes.
They might as well take out the differential, because it's a driver aid...

I would only ban the pre-programming of track position, that's just asking for trouble, and keep it reactive only.

Hoffman900
Hoffman900
211
Joined: 13 Oct 2019, 03:02

Re: 2026 Aerodynamic & Chassis Regulations

Post

Indy Car uses “active” aero / suspension with a driver controlled weight jacker.

F1 can easily do something like that.