I meant that they should have sacked Pérez in the first place, not given him an extension. It shows poor judgment, and it can be seen at Toro Rosso as well, where they are keeping Lawson on cold and can't make up their minds about whether to sack or promote Ricciardo.basti313 wrote:This sentence I do not understand. If they sack Perez it is not a poor discission, right? The only error I can see if they keep him too long and the sponsor money can not fill up the loss.Jurgen von Diaz wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 10:45If they are going to sack Pérez in the summer, it is a continuation of the Horner text scandal and Newey's exit, where the organization is messed up and making poor decisions.
As I remember , Lawson out qualified Tsunoda twice. We usually call that the faster driverispano6 wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 00:57If Lawson was faster than Tsunoda he'd already have been in the RB. Lawson didn't "beat" Tsunoda by any margin, more or less was over-aggressive within intra-team battle and Yuki had to back off, at his home race no less. Probably taught Yuki to step it up.TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑15 Jul 2024, 04:36As far as Lawson goes , how do we really know ? Everyone just assumes it will be Gasly 3.0.
Lawson has a similar temperament to Oscar Piastri. I just don't see him getting bent out of shape trying to beat Max.
He beat Tsonoda on his first 2 tries.
Yeah. It sounds like Wacha should have been up there to present the RB20 but it was Adrien taking all the credit for the car and the first half
Which races? From when Ric was injured at Zandvoort, Yuki out-qualified Lawson at the Dutch and Italy GP. Only Singapore did Liam "beat" Yuki, but more so Yuki made mistakes and didn't show his out-right pace. And then Yuki out-qualified Liam again in Suzuka, however Liam was aggressive on the opening lap and forced Yuki to take evasive action or get taken out by his teammate on home soil. So yeah, Liam showed impressive results subbing in for Ricciardo, but hasn't shown that he should leap-frog Yuki to the RBR seat. I suspect Yuki is being snubbed because he is a Honda driver, a shame really considering RBR will still be using HONDA power units in 2025.TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 20:57As I remember , Lawson out qualified Tsunoda twice. We usually call that the faster driverispano6 wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 00:57If Lawson was faster than Tsunoda he'd already have been in the RB. Lawson didn't "beat" Tsunoda by any margin, more or less was over-aggressive within intra-team battle and Yuki had to back off, at his home race no less. Probably taught Yuki to step it up.TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑15 Jul 2024, 04:36As far as Lawson goes , how do we really know ? Everyone just assumes it will be Gasly 3.0.
Lawson has a similar temperament to Oscar Piastri. I just don't see him getting bent out of shape trying to beat Max.
He beat Tsonoda on his first 2 tries.
You are still referring to the extension as a standard extension in terms that they are bound for additional 2 years.Jurgen von Diaz wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 20:54I meant that they should have sacked Pérez in the first place, not given him an extension. It shows poor judgment, and it can be seen at Toro Rosso as well, where they are keeping Lawson on cold and can't make up their minds about whether to sack or promote Ricciardo.basti313 wrote:This sentence I do not understand. If they sack Perez it is not a poor discission, right? The only error I can see if they keep him too long and the sponsor money can not fill up the loss.Jurgen von Diaz wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 10:45If they are going to sack Pérez in the summer, it is a continuation of the Horner text scandal and Newey's exit, where the organization is messed up and making poor decisions.
Yes this preciselybasti313 wrote: ↑17 Jul 2024, 11:20RedBull handed him this straw provided he agrees to the performance clause and removing his equal treatment.Jurgen von Diaz wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 20:54I meant that they should have sacked Pérez in the first place, not given him an extension. It shows poor judgment, and it can be seen at Toro Rosso as well, where they are keeping Lawson on cold and can't make up their minds about whether to sack or promote Ricciardo.basti313 wrote: This sentence I do not understand. If they sack Perez it is not a poor discission, right? The only error I can see if they keep him too long and the sponsor money can not fill up the loss.
It's more nuanced than that. Red Bull will naturally try to downplay his involvement, given he is leaving - because what use is it to do anything else?littlebigcat wrote: ↑16 Jul 2024, 14:12This comment is funny given the wider Red Bull narrative is that he is no big loss because he wasn’t actually involved in the development of the RB20
More information now starting to come in about the upcoming update to the RB20 for the #HungarianGP. Here is what I have heard,
only 1 upgrade will be available for FP and the race, and this will go on the title contender Max Verstappens car
from a lap time standpoint, this is the biggest update so far this year for the car. If all goes as per plan (simulation) this should be a good step for the car
I’m told the updates will be visual, and the aero kit will be visually noticeable. One person told me “it looks quite different.”
some of the focus of this update package is to again find gains in how the car uses the Tyres, which can be a differentiator in Hungary.
Red Bull never said that the previous upgrades didn't work. When they launched the Suzuka package, Adrian Newey said the following:
https://www.planetf1.com/news/adrian-ne ... grand-prix#:“Well, we know our performance, theoretically,” he said, with Kravitz quickly asking what it may have been: “I’m not telling you that bit!”
Referring to the upgrade package, Newey said, “As far as we can see from the pressure sensors and the load cells, it delivered what it said on the tin from the wind tunnel. It was a small step forward.”
Wait, I am not buying at all the PR formu1a.uno is selling, but, Newey or not, we can safely say that the upgrades that RB brought so far didn't deliver at best, to say the least; they said they changed the concept to have more room of improvement but they burnt a half a second lead in a few races, even though they kept bringing updates; you also have multiple quotes from Marko saying "I'm expecting a lot from this update" but this lot didn't appear on track.AR3-GP wrote: ↑18 Jul 2024, 07:14Red Bull never said that the previous upgrades didn't work. When they launched the Suzuka package, Adrian Newey said the following:
https://www.planetf1.com/news/adrian-ne ... grand-prix#:“Well, we know our performance, theoretically,” he said, with Kravitz quickly asking what it may have been: “I’m not telling you that bit!”
Referring to the upgrade package, Newey said, “As far as we can see from the pressure sensors and the load cells, it delivered what it said on the tin from the wind tunnel. It was a small step forward.”
This is the update that the media are now claiming that Adrian Newey "hated" and was a downgrade. Certain parts of F1 media are just writing "Red Bull is burning" fan fiction for their audiences. I won't name any specific out1ets or journa1ist.
Mclaren brought a 6 tenths update in Miami. I don't see a case of updates which have not delivered. Newey said the Suzuka update delivered, and Max and Marko said the Imola package worked. We can't rewrite that now. Dr. Obbs said the Barcelona stuff was insignificant and that the big update was still to come (Hungary). It is more a case of the previous steps just not being that big for one reason or another (ATR restrictions and/or not being clever enough)Sergej wrote: ↑18 Jul 2024, 07:40Wait, I am not buying at all the PR formu1a.uno is selling, but, Newey or not, we can safely say that the upgrades that RB brought so far didn't deliver at best, to say the least; they said they changed the concept to have more room of improvement but they burnt a half a second lead in a few races, even though they kept bringing updates; you also have multiple quotes from Marko saying "I'm expecting a lot from this update" but this lot didn't appear on track.AR3-GP wrote: ↑18 Jul 2024, 07:14Red Bull never said that the previous upgrades didn't work. When they launched the Suzuka package, Adrian Newey said the following:
https://www.planetf1.com/news/adrian-ne ... grand-prix#:“Well, we know our performance, theoretically,” he said, with Kravitz quickly asking what it may have been: “I’m not telling you that bit!”
Referring to the upgrade package, Newey said, “As far as we can see from the pressure sensors and the load cells, it delivered what it said on the tin from the wind tunnel. It was a small step forward.”
This is the update that the media are now claiming that Adrian Newey "hated" and was a downgrade. Certain parts of F1 media are just writing "Red Bull is burning" fan fiction for their audiences. I won't name any specific out1ets or journa1ist.
I mean it's normal, I'm not pointing the finger at the team, diminishing returns, reality not quite matching simulator, etc, these are normal things in F1 but I think this is the picture at the moment.
You also have the disclaimer from DrObbs "You can have great results on the simulator that don’t translate to the track." which is quite telling imho.
I am saying exactly this, for whatever reason the upgrades so far didn't bring big gains, and I don't think this was in their plan, of course you won't hear from them "oh yes we fuc*ed our upgrades" (I mean look at Vasseur, he's finding every time a new excuse not to admit their upgrade was a disaster !), it's obvious that they kinda worked, but in my opinion not as was to be expectedAR3-GP wrote: ↑18 Jul 2024, 08:08It is more a case of the previous steps just not being that big for one reason or another (ATR restrictions and/or not being clever enough)Sergej wrote: ↑18 Jul 2024, 07:40Wait, I am not buying at all the PR formu1a.uno is selling, but, Newey or not, we can safely say that the upgrades that RB brought so far didn't deliver at best, to say the least; they said they changed the concept to have more room of improvement but they burnt a half a second lead in a few races, even though they kept bringing updates; you also have multiple quotes from Marko saying "I'm expecting a lot from this update" but this lot didn't appear on track.AR3-GP wrote: ↑18 Jul 2024, 07:14
Red Bull never said that the previous upgrades didn't work. When they launched the Suzuka package, Adrian Newey said the following:
https://www.planetf1.com/news/adrian-ne ... grand-prix#:
This is the update that the media are now claiming that Adrian Newey "hated" and was a downgrade. Certain parts of F1 media are just writing "Red Bull is burning" fan fiction for their audiences. I won't name any specific out1ets or journa1ist.
I mean it's normal, I'm not pointing the finger at the team, diminishing returns, reality not quite matching simulator, etc, these are normal things in F1 but I think this is the picture at the moment.
You also have the disclaimer from DrObbs "You can have great results on the simulator that don’t translate to the track." which is quite telling imho.