We need Verstappen to be as far back as possible in Q to make life easier. If we can get two Mclarens in front then he'll have another 2 midfielders to deal with.
We need Verstappen to be as far back as possible in Q to make life easier. If we can get two Mclarens in front then he'll have another 2 midfielders to deal with.
I disagree. McLaren can comfortably focus on setting up the car for the race knowing that they will have track position vs. Verstappen no matter what. Even P11 will be too far back for Verstappen to win without a safety car or red flag, so no need to prioritize qualifying. The real issue is the different conditions between Saturday and Sunday. Especially here in Spa there’s quite a big difference between ideal dry and wet setups, since the track has very different characteristics in sector 1&3 vs 2. Some teams will undoubtedly gamble on a higher starting position by compromising their dry pace (if it does indeed rain). McLaren looks comfortably ahead of everyone but Verstappen though, and so in this regard, too, they should have the advantage of being able to prioritize Sunday.
Since overtaking is possible here and the race will be dry, it makes sense to stick with the option that was in the second practice. You can sacrifice a little qualifying, but be very fast in the race. Points are not given out in qualifying yet.MrGapes wrote: ↑27 Jul 2024, 08:50In terms of downforce levels... Mclaren ran two specs of beam wings yesterday between FP1 and FP2.
Both BWs were single element, but the FP1 beam wing was far less cranked (lower df.)
With rain on the radar today and with priority on the dry race I think there is a possible 3 options they could run
1. Either they have a more cranked single element BW
2. Run a flat horizontal 2nd BW element
3. Stick with the same package (car had good performance in Sector 2 and will probably have to make it up tomorrow in the race tomorrow)
I expect they will split the cars if its wet fp3 one will remain on the normal one spec, and the other higher.
I didn't say anything about setup, just that you'd not want to avoid pole.stonehenge wrote: ↑27 Jul 2024, 09:23I disagree. McLaren can comfortably focus on setting up the car for the race knowing that they will have track position vs. Verstappen no matter what. Even P11 will be too far back for Verstappen to win without a safety car or red flag, so no need to prioritize qualifying. The real issue is the different conditions between Saturday and Sunday. Especially here in Spa there’s quite a big difference between ideal dry and wet setups, since the track has very different characteristics in sector 1&3 vs 2. Some teams will undoubtedly gamble on a higher starting position by compromising their dry pace (if it does indeed rain). McLaren looks comfortably ahead of everyone but Verstappen though, and so in this regard, too, they should have the advantage of being able to prioritize Sunday.
Oh you’re right. My bad. I didn’t see the post you were quoting. Yes, you’re right, what nonsense. You always want to be on pole. What a ridiculous thing to say.mwillems wrote: ↑27 Jul 2024, 09:26I didn't say anything about setup, just that you'd not want to avoid pole.stonehenge wrote: ↑27 Jul 2024, 09:23I disagree. McLaren can comfortably focus on setting up the car for the race knowing that they will have track position vs. Verstappen no matter what. Even P11 will be too far back for Verstappen to win without a safety car or red flag, so no need to prioritize qualifying. The real issue is the different conditions between Saturday and Sunday. Especially here in Spa there’s quite a big difference between ideal dry and wet setups, since the track has very different characteristics in sector 1&3 vs 2. Some teams will undoubtedly gamble on a higher starting position by compromising their dry pace (if it does indeed rain). McLaren looks comfortably ahead of everyone but Verstappen though, and so in this regard, too, they should have the advantage of being able to prioritize Sunday.
But regarding setup, Lando has said that adding downforce might be the way they will go.
Adding DF will help in both the race and in the wet qualifying.
For McLaren getting pole is quite important, as having a straightline speed differential for overtaking looks unlikely. This will also be the conundrum for Max as he will have some overtaking to get done to get on terms with the McLAren drivers. So it's a delicate balancing act for all concerned, I wouldn't want to be in Red Bull's position though - making up the places it normally does with easy will not be quite ass straightforward. The forecast has just shifted to heavier rain now. I am thinking if this becomes reality, cranking on more downforce will be necessary to get through to Q3. How much, who can guess.mwillems wrote: ↑27 Jul 2024, 09:41I think the post might have been suggesting a dry race focus. But in the race you're happier with more Downforce, within limits, because it protects the tyres. Teams will often balance that against expected qualifying performance and how easy it is to overtake.
It's no issue here to add some downforce because it will help the one lap pace today and it will protect the tyres tomorrow. Now the issue is how much to add, because as Lando has found out before, Spa is treacherous in the wet.
I really doubt that Max will have that kind of advantage. I expect 1-2 for McLaren in qualy and race.