To me it seems that the car suspension was set up very soft at least at the front to have such a big dive and presumably this was done due to wet track conditions that needed a higher ride and a softer suspension.AR3-GP wrote: ↑27 Jul 2024, 21:37https://i.postimg.cc/jjwgvyPS/Merc-Bus- ... ualy-3.gif
There were a few good shots of the changing floor pitch and height as the car goes into the bus stop chicane at Spa. There are multiple stages:
1) Max compression (heave) at top speed before the bus stop.
2) Brake dive (sparks from the front of the plank)
3) Nose up when the brakes are released.
Slightly off-topic as this is a thread about W15:atanatizante wrote: ↑27 Jul 2024, 23:54To me it seems that the car suspension was set up very soft at least at the front to have such a big dive and presumably this was done due to wet track conditions that needed a higher ride and a softer suspension.AR3-GP wrote: ↑27 Jul 2024, 21:37https://i.postimg.cc/jjwgvyPS/Merc-Bus- ... ualy-3.gif
There were a few good shots of the changing floor pitch and height as the car goes into the bus stop chicane at Spa. There are multiple stages:
1) Max compression (heave) at top speed before the bus stop.
2) Brake dive (sparks from the front of the plank)
3) Nose up when the brakes are released.
Besides that there are rumors saying that their suspension didn't cope in the high-speed corners with the increase load generated by the new floor and diffuser and at a certain speed and threshold load the car is porpoising porpoising...
The reason for that issue is the endless miscorrelation between the CFD+WT and the real track results due to the 60% scale model they use but mainly due to the inability to simulate lateral loads when the car is in a yaw situation...
So they need to roll back these upgrades and go to the same route like Ferrari did throughout a modified floor and suspension to cope with these peak loads.
Finally, what's interesting to know, is how come MCL38 is the single car this year that their upgrades were working flowlessly ...
Yeah, Toto confirmed that at Sky after the race ... it seems that it was a mechanical issue and their chief engineer had spotted it afterward. Then after the Friday night and Saturday morning hours at the sim they were keen to try the new changes but unfortunately, we had a wet FP3 and they thought it would be wiser to revert to the old spec car, a known quantity ...Luscion wrote: ↑28 Jul 2024, 17:51Turns out the issue wasnt the upgrades, it was a mechanical issue they found and fixed. Upgrades will be on the car in Zandvoort
https://www.crash.net/f1/news/1052865/1 ... belgian-gp (bottom of the article)
very hard wobbling on the front wing of the W15 in comparison to the SF-24, MCL38 and AMR24. do you have a gif of the RB20 fw in the same corner maybe too?AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Jul 2024, 00:08Spa 2024 FP1
https://i.postimg.cc/59QY5VpJ/Mercedes-Spa-2024-FP1.gif
i guess you can ask mr bulge whos residing over the front nose of their car loldigitalrurouni wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024, 08:51I'd be curious what the mechanical setup issue was for the Mercedes. I mean it seems to have unlocked a whole heap of pace from their car.
Very good sequence depicting the gap between the first and second element shrinking and expanding, and how bringing in the scrubbing plates toward the nose to use the first element as a springboard to absorb the impact of the suspension CAN act as a mass damper. It's not so obvious since Russell isn't going directly over the curb but the nose and monocoque don't appear to be phased at all.AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Jul 2024, 00:08Spa 2024 FP1
https://i.postimg.cc/59QY5VpJ/Mercedes-Spa-2024-FP1.gif