They already have enough experience with the Sainz cartel so it actually makes sense that they would stay clear now, no?
Gapping Leclerc was extreme since Leclerc had to defend against Max right after Piastri passed him, this costs a lot of time on the long lap of Spa. Norris was stuck behind Max and couldn't take him, which is why Piastri was a lot faster.codetower wrote: ↑29 Jul 2024, 20:48And that lap 39 to 42 where Piastri is .95 seconds faster than Leclerc, that happened once he passed him and was over 5 seconds behind Hamilton (clean-ish air). He was also significantly faster during those laps than his "faster" teammate in the same car. He was about .85 seconds/lap faster than Norris during those laps as well.
Agreed. And realistically, given the nature of this track and the problems Ferrari is facing, I expected much worse from them on this track. It seems like the findings and learnings of the last few races have been applied to some extent. Also, I'm pretty sure they're not that far off. If they manage to solve the bouncing or at least make another step I think they'll be pretty close to being able to win on merit. They're probably lacking bouncing fix + 0.150 to 0.250 secs of upgrades to be the best.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024, 08:48Gapping Leclerc was extreme since Leclerc had to defend against Max right after Piastri passed him, this costs a lot of time on the long lap of Spa. Norris was stuck behind Max and couldn't take him, which is why Piastri was a lot faster.codetower wrote: ↑29 Jul 2024, 20:48And that lap 39 to 42 where Piastri is .95 seconds faster than Leclerc, that happened once he passed him and was over 5 seconds behind Hamilton (clean-ish air). He was also significantly faster during those laps than his "faster" teammate in the same car. He was about .85 seconds/lap faster than Norris during those laps as well.
It will be very hard to have that same improvement since a good part of 23->24 improvement came from a revised chassis configuration and sidepod geometry. They will have a small aero improvement with pull rod geometry, but the biggest improvement will have to come from better suspension design with respect to tyre window operation and aero platform integration. The only high-profile vacancy this year is from Cardille and these 14 races have shown he managed to turn things around, but definitely put too many limits on suspension design and thus limited the number of aero development paths.AtOmIc wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024, 11:09If they can make the same improvement year on year as they did '23 to '24 I's say '25 is looking good. I'm more worried about the high profile guys leaving the team and who will come in their place. I think this team did a decent job and a good step compared to last year.
Good summary, regarding Cardille I think this year the team also lost head of simulations or something like that to Merc. and if I remember reading up on it he was pretty important for good correlation between the simulations and windtunnel and on track.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024, 11:36Summer break points analysis:
- Ferrari cut the gap in WCC to Red Bull by a whopping 80%, from -312 to -63
- Ferrari improved WCC points tally also by 80%, from 191 to 345 (it was 357 in 2022)
- Ferrari scored 2 wins in 2024 vs 0 in 2023
- Ferrari scored 11 race podiums in 2024 vs 3 in 2023 (+266%)
- Leclerc (leading driver in both seasons) cut the gap in WDC by 51%, from -205 to -100 (it was -80 in 2022)
- Leclerc improved WDC points tally by 79%, from 99 to 177 (178 in 2022)
Full chart (WDC points gap delta is inverted, should by 51% and not 49%)
https://i.ibb.co/yQJGr9d/summer-break.jpg
Far more telling of Ferrari's improvement is comparing average gap to the front between finished races in 2nd half of 2022 and 1st halves of 23 and 24 (race win is negative gap to the first non-ferrari car, if counted as 0s the average gap goes up by just 1s)
- H2 2022 17.0s
- H1 2023 35.6s
- H1 2024 13.4s
I did not expect to see them 4s better than 2nd half of 2022, but this is because of Mexico 2022 gap of 58s for Sainz and 2 race wins so far this year. 2023 was absolutely abysmal in every way...It will be difficult to outscore season 2022 in WCC because of such a competitive field right now (even with 2 more races overall), but all other metrics point to Ferrari being a far better team in terms of execution and maximising the results every weekend, while the car will surely be further improved relative to the front.
It will be very hard to have that same improvement since a good part of 23->24 improvement came from a revised chassis configuration and sidepod geometry. They will have a small aero improvement with pull rod geometry, but the biggest improvement will have to come from better suspension design with respect to tyre window operation and aero platform integration. The only high-profile vacancy this year is from Cardille and these 14 races have shown he managed to turn things around, but definitely put too many limits on suspension design and thus limited the number of aero development paths.AtOmIc wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024, 11:09If they can make the same improvement year on year as they did '23 to '24 I's say '25 is looking good. I'm more worried about the high profile guys leaving the team and who will come in their place. I think this team did a decent job and a good step compared to last year.
Yes, there's absolutely way too much negativity and jumping to conclusions - and most of it comes from Italian journalists unfortunately. I hope Elkann starts doing something about this and have the negative publicity cut to a minimum.AtOmIc wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024, 13:18EDIT: Aslo, I think that the team is getting too much --- for every little imperfection while others don't get nearly enough. It's not only the forums it's the media as well. It puts unnecessary pressure to the team. We can see other teams this year also had their fair number of major screwups. Imagine Ferrari being DNQ after winning the race. I can Imagine angry mob wanting Freds head on a stick haha. Or if while fighting for the lead Lec or Sainz made a mistake and crashed into another driver. There would be gazillion posts how they're unfit and that type of comments. People need to chill down and stop being so toxic and negative. If mclaren and merc didn't made those huge jumps everyone would be talking how Ferrari is much improved and awesome but still not competent to compete for wcc and how that's somehow end of the world while they would enjoy probably points wise their best season in ages. What's really important is that the team is improving in all areas and is cathing up to the front. It's much better team then they were this time last year and I would say even 2022.
So that's higher than Head of aerodynamic development.
Bigois is responsible for correlation and wind tunnel model manufacturing, test arrangements and other operational aspectsK1Plus wrote: ↑03 Aug 2024, 11:19So that's higher than Head of aerodynamic development.
I know Loic Bigois was the head of aerodynamic operations, could this mean he's leaving and Diego staying in his role...
I mean head of aerodynamics should be the same as head of aerodynamic operations so, essentially yeah promotion...
They had their testing session in Austria and Silverstone already. There is no better proof of their complete understanding of the situation than a huge improvement in high-speed corners in Spa compared to Silverstone. They have a lot of room to add some rear downforce, but will have to increase the front wing load at some point to keep the balance right.Sevach wrote: ↑01 Aug 2024, 05:15It looks like Ferrari needs another "soul searching" like they had at Zandvoort last year.
For all the talk of "new concept", the floor design was an evolution of what the team had last year, maybe they should look at other floors, floor sideblades... to get out of this hole.
https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-fe ... /10641752/Elliott is currently gardening and could be free in early 2025. Is this the man Vasseur will focus on? We'll have to wait a few weeks to find out, but there aren't many profiles of this caliber available.
Lewis Hamilton and Loïc Serra would have rehabilitated the figure of Mike Elliott