I think there is some truth to it. But context matters too.PapayaFan481 wrote: β27 Aug 2024, 02:42This!!PlatinumZealot wrote: β27 Aug 2024, 01:16Horner did not deny anything. An innocent man bites back agressively. Horney was extremely timid and quiet over the matters and seemingly got more timid as the "evidence" was released.
The story is surely real even if Horner is "Legally innocent"
The stuff that was leaked I think should have had him removed. Its very open to what exactly the KC report said i.e. we found evendence of wrong doing by CH however if challenged in court reasons for dismissal are low and CH would likely win any case.
RB could have decided to let it go rather than drag it through court. But I get the feeling too that there is something missing too.
I'm not always a fan of he acted a certain way therefore they are or are not guilty, Answers are not always that simple and there are often a lot of details behind that are not public, I've followed cases over the years and fallen into the same trap when its been trial by media - I am sure there is plenty of truth to it and CH maybe very lucky he is still there. but we've only really heard one side too