Lando would be within 17 if they completely priotized him. That’s 45 points or 73% of his total gap to Max. That’s not championship driving when your team needs to spoon feed you 73% of your points gap.Dunlay wrote: ↑02 Sep 2024, 05:36History is full of examples of how to prioritize team's objective and do things that are important, regardless of a driver is defending his position or not. Losing a WDC is a matter of shame with such stupid decisions. Remember James Vowel's, "Valtteri this is James here". That's how you make tough decisions.Hoffman900 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2024, 05:34You can’t priotize a position if the driver isn’t up to the task of defending himself.Dunlay wrote: ↑02 Sep 2024, 05:32I don't need to race anything to have some sense of managing teams and it's core objectives. Regardless of what Lando did or Oscar did, team should have simply prioritized Lando's position who has the best chance to win the WDC given how weak Red Bull has got. Bigger team objectives are important than petty driver ambition.
That’s motorsports and sports in general. Nothing is handed to you. It’s the whole GR “but I was forecasted to win” attitude.
They do that, they absolutely lose Oscar on the next contract, who imo, has a much higher ceiling than Lando.