Macklaren wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 02:26
bananapeel23 wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:53
Macklaren wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:20
I'm not concerned about Ferrari for constructors.... Almost all their wins this season have been lucky. We are faster than them.
Def need Oscar up there though. I'm not going to say anything about Max because he doesn't deserve my attention
????
Ferrari dominated COTA and Monaco. Sainz was comfortably fastest in Mexico. Monza was arguably about 50/50 because Leclerc was amazing on his tyres and might've won even if McLaren went for a 1-stopper.
Ferrari has usually been the fastest when they have won. The only real exception is Australia.
Ummm. At monza LEC won with an insane strategy gamble after he was gifted the lead by the battling McLarens, COTA they were gifted the lead by Max, in Mexico, if Lando didn't have Max the Seagull dive-bombing him, he would have been on Carlos's rear wing within a couple laps. Monaco was somewhat dominant but you can't pass there anyway
In Monza the poor tyre deg of the McLarens was masked by them pitting. Piastri was already falling off a cliff and was being lined up for an overtake by Leclerc when he came into the pits. They were degging off hard and would have really struggled to win on a one-stop.
I don't necessarily think Leclerc would have won it by a large margin, or even necessarily won. He did however have the pure pace to win if both one-stopped and I'm very confident he would have at least gotten into DRS range of Norris by the end of the race.
Ferrari was lucky in the sense that McLaren made the race very easy for them. Leclerc would likely have been in with a chance of P1 either way.