2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
Jdn1327
Jdn1327
1
Joined: 07 Apr 2022, 12:47

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Seanspeed wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 13:23
Jdn1327 wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 13:15
Could the penalties for cfd hours be manifesting itself now?
Seems more like they simply have lost direction without Newey. Even if Newey wasn't penning all the designs nowadays, he was still important for his ability to recognize issues and providing a successful development course for solving them. He was also very good at providing direction in terms of setup and how the cars needed to be ran on a given weekend. Both these things Red Bull have struggled with since he left and I cant see that's just some crazy coincidence.
RBR put on a brave face when Newey left but the effect is clear. I don't blame the teams decline solely on that...but a lot of key personnel have left. That added to the penalty of less cfd time has really hurt them.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1571
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

PapayaFan481 wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 18:51
Were you watching a different race??
Guys, honestly, I'm not interested in redditing and twittering here. Driver ying yang does not interest me. I watched the race and rewatched both cases multiple times

If you have specific arguments to counter my point, by all means write them down and lets discuss :)
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

User avatar
langedweil
0
Joined: 23 Mar 2018, 20:51
Location: Caribbean

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

FittingMechanics wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 19:38
langedweil wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 19:22
Mattchu wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 19:10
Well the other two stewards were French and a Mexican and they fully agreed with the ruling, but I suppose there`s some bias in them as well! I mean, have some of you even read the what they said.

https://i.postimg.cc/YqvHs5Dq/t8.png

How do you gain a position if you're already ahead ?
You haven't completed the overtake, you were just entitled to the space but since you didn't manage to stay on track, the overtake is not complete and you need to give back the position. It's quite simple.
Yeah well, as Lando was ahead after T5 he already had his position.
So what is there to give back then !?
There was no issue as Nor gained his position ..
HuggaWugga !

Emag
Emag
84
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post



This is what would have happened if Max was a normal driver. The only reason Lando could not complete the overtake is because he was pushed off completely.

User avatar
Jurgen von Diaz
0
Joined: 11 Feb 2024, 18:38

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Emag wrote:

This is what would have happened if Max was a normal driver. The only reason Lando could not complete the overtake is because he was pushed off completely.
Yes, Max isn't a normal driver. He is soon to be a 4x champ, becoming a legend like Senna and Schumacher by being a dick like them.

User avatar
Vettel165
4
Joined: 06 Apr 2018, 20:46
Location: Maribor/Slovenia

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Emag wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 00:41


This is what would have happened if Max was a normal driver. The only reason Lando could not complete the overtake is because he was pushed off completely.
Yeah agree, he is much better than being normal. This is what I like about him, he is always on the limit/edge, just like Senna, Michael were. Normal is boring. Sometimes it doesnt work, but when it does it looks amazing. Lets move on.

Watto
Watto
4
Joined: 10 Mar 2022, 15:12

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 21:00
PapayaFan481 wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 18:51
Were you watching a different race??
Guys, honestly, I'm not interested in redditing and twittering here. Driver ying yang does not interest me. I watched the race and rewatched both cases multiple times

If you have specific arguments to counter my point, by all means write them down and lets discuss :)

I do think Lando worked the rules against Max here.

I think he would have just made T4 but would have been heavily compromised for T5.

Carried the extra speed into T4 to get to the apex ahead of Max knowing Max would push him wide - even to the point I agree Lando has gone in probably willing to accept he may not make the corner.

The only question I have - and this probably goes back to the point of McLarens protest, Was Lando considered the attacker here. Max did make the corner.

I think the penalty was there but I do think the the media making Max more a villan than he really was.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

I think I understand why they are waiting until Thursday to decide on taking the engine. They are waiting for the weather forecast. If it's wet, they won't take the engine since laptime is less sensitive to engine power in wet conditions. If it's dry, they'll take it. If it's wet and they don't take the engine, they'll just take it in Las Vegas where it will be dry and there's long DRS straights.
A lion must kill its prey.

Watto
Watto
4
Joined: 10 Mar 2022, 15:12

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 01:37
I think I understand why they are waiting until Thursday to decide on taking the engine. They are waiting for the weather forecast. If it's wet, they won't take the engine since laptime is less sensitive to engine power in wet conditions. If it's dry, they'll take it. If it's wet and they don't take the engine, they'll just take it in Las Vegas where it will be dry and there's long DRS straights.
Makes sense having a quick look at the forecast. But I wonder if the potential for rain makes it more or less likely to upgrade this weekend?

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
365
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Watto wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 01:46
AR3-GP wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 01:37
I think I understand why they are waiting until Thursday to decide on taking the engine. They are waiting for the weather forecast. If it's wet, they won't take the engine since laptime is less sensitive to engine power in wet conditions. If it's dry, they'll take it. If it's wet and they don't take the engine, they'll just take it in Las Vegas where it will be dry and there's long DRS straights.
Makes sense having a quick look at the forecast. But I wonder if the potential for rain makes it more or less likely to upgrade this weekend?
If it's wet, there will not be DRS to help with overtaking. Visibility will be poor. Risk for a 1st lap crash in the wet starting from the middle of the pack is also very high.

They should have taken the engine back in Monza.
A lion must kill its prey.

Watto
Watto
4
Joined: 10 Mar 2022, 15:12

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 01:56
Watto wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 01:46
AR3-GP wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 01:37
I think I understand why they are waiting until Thursday to decide on taking the engine. They are waiting for the weather forecast. If it's wet, they won't take the engine since laptime is less sensitive to engine power in wet conditions. If it's dry, they'll take it. If it's wet and they don't take the engine, they'll just take it in Las Vegas where it will be dry and there's long DRS straights.
Makes sense having a quick look at the forecast. But I wonder if the potential for rain makes it more or less likely to upgrade this weekend?
If it's wet, there will not be DRS to help with overtaking. Visibility will be poor. Risk for a 1st lap crash in the wet starting from the middle of the pack is also very high.

They should have taken the engine back in Monza.
Yeah that was what I was thinking. Just wondered ever so slightly if it was going to be a wet/dry race if the extra pit stop might hide the penalty a little

PapayaFan481
PapayaFan481
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2024, 13:08

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 21:00
PapayaFan481 wrote:
28 Oct 2024, 18:51
Were you watching a different race??
Guys, honestly, I'm not interested in redditing and twittering here. Driver ying yang does not interest me. I watched the race and rewatched both cases multiple times

If you have specific arguments to counter my point, by all means write them down and lets discuss :)
OK. T4: Lando was 100% making that corner until Max forced him off the road. If Lando didn't open up his steering to avoid Max then they collide. It is that simple and someone has already kindly provided still frames of the corner in the other thread to support this. T5 UNDER THE CURRENT RULES, is a separate corner and has no bearing.

T8: Even Max has offered no defence there, only complained about the penalty. So you seem to disagree with even the driver you're defending. When experienced F1 drivers up and down the grid are calling the T8 move "dangerous" and crossing the line, why do you think you know better than them?
If I come across as blunt, I apologise, it's my ASD. Sometimes, like an F1 car aqua-planing, it gets out of my control.

User avatar
Vanja #66
1571
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

PapayaFan481 wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 07:51
OK. T4: Lando was 100% making that corner until Max forced him off the road. If Lando didn't open up his steering to avoid Max then they collide. It is that simple and someone has already kindly provided still frames of the corner in the other thread to support this. T5 UNDER THE CURRENT RULES, is a separate corner and has no bearing.

T8: Even Max has offered no defence there, only complained about the penalty. So you seem to disagree with even the driver you're defending. When experienced F1 drivers up and down the grid are calling the T8 move "dangerous" and crossing the line, why do you think you know better than them?
In T4 Norris opened up his steering wheel and immediately turned right to cut T5 to overtake Max. He had no intention of making T5, but I can't say of his intention to leave track right after T4 even though he'd have to apply brakes a lot more to have any hope of making T5.

As for T8, Norris was 50m earlier on brakes than he was the next lap (Max was on brakes at about the same place as usual, though couple of meters early as well) and instead of going wide to switch back he keeps himself alongside Max.

Image

How did Max force Norris off track if Norris was so far back by the time they reach the track limit? What prevented him going right and wide a bit to turn left (yellow line) and let Max look like a total amateur for going off on his own? Nothing at all, it was his own choice to stick alongside Max and run wide, he was completely behind Max and therefore couldn't have been pushed wide because Max was already ahead. 10s penalty for Max has no legs to stand on, other than steward bias

Image

I have no idea what you're on about all drivers calling the move dangerous, no one was asked. And if they were, they had no access to full telemetry or full video recordings like stewards do when they make their decisions

PapayaFan481 wrote:
29 Oct 2024, 07:42
So Horner argued that Lando should have gotten a penalty for basically doing what Max did last week without getting a penalty?

Seems about right for Mr Horner.
Not sure what you're on about mate. Lando got a (reduced) penalty for overtaking outside the track last week and should have gotten it now too. It was cut by 5s in Austin because stewards acknowledged he was forced outside the track, but still got 5s because he decided to stick with an illegal overtake. Did he not make an overtake outside the track in T5 in Mexico?
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

FittingMechanics
FittingMechanics
16
Joined: 19 Feb 2019, 12:10

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Vanja you are really destroying your credibility with these nonsensical arguments.

In T4 Norris and Verstappen touch wheels as Max drifts over the white line (ensuring Norris can't stay on track). It is utterly ridiculous to claim that Norris "opened up the steering" and "immediately turned right". He did so after they touched. Norris was pretty much full lock while Verstappen was the one who "opened up the steering" to drift to the white line.

Your T8 argument falls apart because Verstappen got the penalty for T8 because he gained an advantage off track, not because Norris was forced wide (even though he was).

deargodhelpme
deargodhelpme
0
Joined: 14 Sep 2024, 16:33

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Even Jos said T8 was too much from Max...