Aston Martin AMR24

[diffuser]

Can we start calling these "upgrades" downgrades?? I mean, I know they aren't meant to improve the car overall, they are just the base of the AMR25, but they are making the car more difficult to drive, specially creating a lot of understeer.

Also, bad upgrades for Mercedes as well, they had a good sprint qualy but in the sprint itself they were eating their tyres and in normal qualy they weren't particularly fast. They also made the car more unstable. What's wrong with Mercedes wind tunnel?? Can't wait to finally use our tunnel and see if that was causing correlation issues. Also, do you think Mercedes rear suspesion causes all these tyre deg issues? Cause its been the same for us the whole year.

These comments should be in the Aston Martin team room, not the AMR24.

[diffuser]

Motorsport FP1 Pics
Drugovich

Gathering Data on Old sidepods...



Looks like Old Floor Edge fences too.




Stroll with New hardware and gathering data.

[KimiRai]

Motorsport FP1 Pics
Drugovich

Gathering Data on Old sidepods...

https://cdn-1.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... etail.webp

Looks like Old Floor Edge fences too.

https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... rtin-.webp


Stroll with New hardware and gathering data.
https://cdn-5.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -amr2.webp
https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -amr2.webp
https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -amr2.webp

In the end it seems they went for Austin front wing, Hungary sidepods and Imola floor. Frankenstein just like last year

[diffuser]

Motorsport FP1 Pics
Drugovich

Gathering Data on Old sidepods...

https://cdn-1.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... etail.webp

Looks like Old Floor Edge fences too.

https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... rtin-.webp


Stroll with New hardware and gathering data.
https://cdn-5.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -amr2.webp
https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -amr2.webp
https://cdn-6.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -amr2.webp

In the end it seems they went for Austin front wing, Hungary sidepods and Imola floor. Frankenstein just like last year

Where did you learn that? Thought I saw the Austin sidepods on Alonso's car in the F1 TV feed.

[diffuser]

Picts from Quali ...

[KimiRai]

In the end it seems they went for Austin front wing, Hungary sidepods and Imola floor. Frankenstein just like last year

Nevermind, it wasn't the Imola floor but rather Suzuka's:

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... n-ferrari/

Aston Martin
In Austin, the fifth underbody of the year was conjured up from the hat. The stations until then: start of the season, Suzuka, Imola, Budapest and Austin. Because nothing worked in Austin and the Aston Martin was only really fast in two corners, but sometimes lost dramatically in the others, a big comparison test was held in Mexico. There were three sub-floors to choose from: Suzuka, Budapest and Austin. The winner was Suzuka, the oldest model. The drivers immediately recognized progress and would have landed in Q3 without the red flag. Grade: 2

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... -red-bull/
Aston Martin went away empty-handed for the second time in a row, but Mexico was an important step forward for the team. A big underbody comparison test ended with the Suzuka soil being the best. All other parts of the car were Austin. The drivers immediately felt a calmer driving behavior. The red flag in Q2 cost Alonso and Stroll the Q3.

Not sure why it says "All other parts of the car were Austin" as sidepods are clearly not Austin spec. Either Suzuka or Budapest.

[diffuser]

In the end it seems they went for Austin front wing, Hungary sidepods and Imola floor. Frankenstein just like last year

Nevermind, it wasn't the Imola floor but rather Suzuka's:

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... n-ferrari/

Aston Martin
In Austin, the fifth underbody of the year was conjured up from the hat. The stations until then: start of the season, Suzuka, Imola, Budapest and Austin. Because nothing worked in Austin and the Aston Martin was only really fast in two corners, but sometimes lost dramatically in the others, a big comparison test was held in Mexico. There were three sub-floors to choose from: Suzuka, Budapest and Austin. The winner was Suzuka, the oldest model. The drivers immediately recognized progress and would have landed in Q3 without the red flag. Grade: 2

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... -red-bull/
Aston Martin went away empty-handed for the second time in a row, but Mexico was an important step forward for the team. A big underbody comparison test ended with the Suzuka soil being the best. All other parts of the car were Austin. The drivers immediately felt a calmer driving behavior. The red flag in Q2 cost Alonso and Stroll the Q3.

Not sure why it says "All other parts of the car were Austin" as sidepods are clearly not Austin spec. Either Suzuka or Budapest.

I noticed that. Cause they're wrong.

[diffuser]

2024 Floor fence history.

First Race ...



Suzuka



Imola ->Silerstone



Hungry


New teeth



Baku
They already had reverted the floor entry back to pre-Hungry.


Austin - reintroduces some of the changes they brought in Imola with a twists... That's the direction they want to go but they can make that drive-able.



Mexico quali ...looks like Suzuka with Hungry teeth


Brazil Looks like they ran Austin floor
Sprint Quali

Sprint Race

Quali

Race