V10 exhaust configuration

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
JordanMugen
85
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: V10 exhaust configuration

Post

hsg wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 14:23
F1 always had 10 into 2? what are advantages of that in power and aero aspect?
Given the powerband involved it probably wouldn't be helpful, but presumably it would make it sound more like 36,000rpm instead of 18,000rpm which would be wild! :D

[Or rather it would make it sound like a 18,000rpm V10 instead of like two 18,000rpm inline-fives^? Although I don't know what the acoustic effects are when you are far away and the sources are (in effect) close together for a car that's far away?]

^ On the exhaust side. If I understand correctly there is a single airbox and it's not divided for left and right banks...?

User avatar
JordanMugen
85
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: V10 exhaust configuration

Post

Hoffman900 wrote:
30 Sep 2024, 15:08
For example; we had a header built that was the same exact length, same collector, but focus on packaging and nice big bend radii. ... Even with the same length, it made 10-12% more power everywhere and much better in the transients. This exercise was all about managing flow losses which opens up your ability to use diameters the engine actually wants and makes sense for the use.
That's a good anecdote!

It seems to match up with ~950hp F1 V10s, which presumably moved a similar flow rate of air to ~950hp NASCAR small block V8s. Big bend radii etc:
Image

But should one not be cautious trying to compare 5.7L 1000hp small block crossplane V8s to typical 3L 500hp Formula 3000 flatplane V8s? As seen on the previous page, the Formula 3000 header systems are very long and have lots of bends, no? So the thinking there seems more like as suggested by Tommy Cookers and leblanc? :?:

Tommy Cookers wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 17:27
length equality of 'headers' is much more important than curvatures
leblanc wrote:
30 Sep 2024, 03:16
Especially with naturally aspirated engines, tuned, equal-length headers have the greatest advantage.
The Formula 3000 header is very different to a Formula 1 header after all!

Even older F1 headers, when the rpm and power output were lower, are more like the Formula 3000 header. [Unless that's just outdated 1990's thinking? :?: ]

Early 90's V10:
Image

Late 00's V8:
Image

Also: timing belts on a racing engine?! :o What possessed Renault/Mecachrome to not use gears? :)

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
48
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: V10 exhaust configuration

Post

Yes. The Renault RS1 3.5L 65 DEGREE BABK ANGLE V-10 used camshafts belt drive as also did the Renault 1.5L TURBO V-6, as also did the Alfa Romeo F1 TURBO V-8.