2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
ScuderiaLeo
0
Joined: 20 May 2024, 15:29
Location: Mexico

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

basti313 wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 21:05
I have never seen a driver jump into a front running or whatever car and bottling the starts with this consistency. Did you see Leclerc or Russel doing regularly bad starts?
I mean....even if you are not the best starter, getting more starts well than bad should be a possibility for a F1 driver. I really feel sorry, but this is a running gag, not something "about learning".

Same for strategy. They had two wet races this season and bottled the strategy in both. How do you want to learn this? There is no learning, you have one or two races per year. That is a topic of awareness and being a midfield team is nothing one would accept as a reason for being unaware. I do not believe Zak is happy with the explanation on "we were in the midfield" for bottling the strategy...
To be fair to Norris... despite Russell's excellence in this past race, he isn't actually a very good starter on average. His net positions on start is in the negatives. Sainz is also in the negatives. It's not like Norris is the only driver semi-consistently losing positions on starts.

basti313
basti313
28
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 14:49

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

ScuderiaLeo wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 22:38
basti313 wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 21:05
I have never seen a driver jump into a front running or whatever car and bottling the starts with this consistency. Did you see Leclerc or Russel doing regularly bad starts?
I mean....even if you are not the best starter, getting more starts well than bad should be a possibility for a F1 driver. I really feel sorry, but this is a running gag, not something "about learning".

Same for strategy. They had two wet races this season and bottled the strategy in both. How do you want to learn this? There is no learning, you have one or two races per year. That is a topic of awareness and being a midfield team is nothing one would accept as a reason for being unaware. I do not believe Zak is happy with the explanation on "we were in the midfield" for bottling the strategy...
To be fair to Norris... despite Russell's excellence in this past race, he isn't actually a very good starter on average. His net positions on start is in the negatives. Sainz is also in the negatives. It's not like Norris is the only driver semi-consistently losing positions on starts.
No, he is the worst. By far, outliers removed, he is the worst current driver on the first lap:
https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comme ... /#lightbox

daren_p wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 21:39
On the initial start, do we know yet if it was actually Lando's fault?
Come on...
Don`t russel the hamster!

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

It would make sense for Mercedes to part ways with Toto Wolf and return to Mclaren as shareholders.

This time they could buy into the automotive too.

Image

venkyhere
venkyhere
14
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Darth-Piekus wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 20:32
I would like to give my honest opinion. Hear me out before passing judgement. I might play devil's advocate and some may be hurt if I say it but I have to say it. Do you know that the line between success and failure is very thin? People these last two days tend to ignore many factors that lead to that result and tend to overexaggerate the result. Sure I agree that Lando screwed yet another start and I agree that Max drove a masterful race but let's see.
1)He started 17th. 4 places were vacant as they started from the pitlane so 13th. Two cars were the B-Team who got orders to let him pass against the rules of the competition so 11th. After that he passed 4 cars and none of them even made an attempt to defend and I was dissapointed in Piastri not even trying to defend.
2)The first car that defended was Charles Leclerc and Max never managed to pass him. He was stuck for 26 laps.
3)The VSC ended the moment both George and Lando entered the entrance of the pit lane. Nobody could predict that and that damaged their safe pit stop window.
4)Then there was a normal SC that bunched up all the cars. Norris passed Rusell and he was at that point faster than Max and the two Alpines by 4 seconds per lap. Still the SC bunched up the field and it's safe to say that the first three had to enter or risk getting passed. In any case you would expect that Max and both Alpines would have been at the end of the pack until Colapinto somehow lost the car on Safety Car speeds. The Red Flag was a total lucky event noone could predict giving them a free pit stop.
5)Under normal circumstances Max would have been dead last without the Red Flag and then nothing suggests he would be able to pass everyone considering he couldn't pass Leclerc not to mention he would be stuck in the dirty air. I will agree that he would have been on the top 10 but not in the podium places.

Good job for his masterful race but let's not overexxagerate.
Didn't want to talk about a non Mclaren driver here, but there are some factual errors above -
To go from P17 to P6 and get to the tail of LeClerc, Max overtook 9 cars (there were just 2 vacant spots on the grid, not 4). Then he got lucky that he didn't have to overtake LeClerc, Tsunoda, Norris, Russel, because they all pitted. The only other overtake he did was Ocon after the second safety car. So overall 10 overtakes in total (2 did not start, 3 started behind ; to account for a total of 19 cars other than himself).

However, the matter of high praise for him is not really about the 'number of overtakes' anyway.

All the mainstream/social media hype about this 'verstappen masterclass' is 90% by people who don't understand racing , but from those 10% who actually understand, it is not about the P17 or the number of overtakes etc.. It's about the cleverness and skill involved in how different the lines he chose to drive were (for example the outside T3 passing of 3-4 cars in first lap was reminiscent of the same thing from brazil 2016 ; another example was how much kerb he was taking on T12 to straighten before applying full throttle for sector3) , about how he was braking into T1 and yet not locking up his fronts, and how smooth the inputs were for all the sector2 turns. The car wasn't eccentrically loaded at any point where he had to saw at the steering wheel to wrestle back the car (of course, don't know what he was doing with his feet because we can't see it on the onboard footage). As a result his tyres were in much better shape than anyone.
Yes he got lucky with red flag ; yes, many of the laptimes (until the 2nd safety car) were very similar to Russel/Norris. But it was the way in which those laptimes were achieved without punishing the car/tyres.
All the praise across the paddock from 'people in the know' is really about how differently he was driving to everyone else. It's not about the 'how much gap' or 'how many places' or any such measurable numbers.

Szabi1112
Szabi1112
0
Joined: 25 Mar 2018, 08:50

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Weekend was painful.. really really painful, however as somebody said we could increase the gap between us and Ferrari and we can win the WCC which would be a fantastic result.
I was born in 1994 I’m fan of McLaren for as long as I remember. I never experienced winning a constructor championship.

So hope the best!

User avatar
AMG.Tzan
43
Joined: 24 Jan 2013, 01:35
Location: Greece

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Norris’s championship was pretty much lost after the first 5 races of the season! He lost around 30-40 points to Max there alone, even though Max had a DNF there…

If McLaren had the form it has had after Miami (finishing close to Max or ahead of him) in these first 5 races he would have been much closer now and probably would have taken the championship to the final round!

But in any case both Max and Red Bull have been the better combination throughout the year…experience of winning championships probably helps this too! Plus Norris isn’t still ready for a championship…maybe next year he’ll be a more rounded driver!
"The only rule is there are no rules" - Aristotle Onassis

User avatar
Darth-Piekus
-1
Joined: 28 Apr 2018, 15:27
Location: Greece

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Do you think that Lando Norris dipped in form this year in race starts, racecraft and strategical thinking compared to 2021, 2022 and 2023?

Ben1980
Ben1980
1
Joined: 19 Jun 2022, 10:11

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

venkyhere wrote:
05 Nov 2024, 06:56
Darth-Piekus wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 20:32
I would like to give my honest opinion. Hear me out before passing judgement. I might play devil's advocate and some may be hurt if I say it but I have to say it. Do you know that the line between success and failure is very thin? People these last two days tend to ignore many factors that lead to that result and tend to overexaggerate the result. Sure I agree that Lando screwed yet another start and I agree that Max drove a masterful race but let's see.
1)He started 17th. 4 places were vacant as they started from the pitlane so 13th. Two cars were the B-Team who got orders to let him pass against the rules of the competition so 11th. After that he passed 4 cars and none of them even made an attempt to defend and I was dissapointed in Piastri not even trying to defend.
2)The first car that defended was Charles Leclerc and Max never managed to pass him. He was stuck for 26 laps.
3)The VSC ended the moment both George and Lando entered the entrance of the pit lane. Nobody could predict that and that damaged their safe pit stop window.
4)Then there was a normal SC that bunched up all the cars. Norris passed Rusell and he was at that point faster than Max and the two Alpines by 4 seconds per lap. Still the SC bunched up the field and it's safe to say that the first three had to enter or risk getting passed. In any case you would expect that Max and both Alpines would have been at the end of the pack until Colapinto somehow lost the car on Safety Car speeds. The Red Flag was a total lucky event noone could predict giving them a free pit stop.
5)Under normal circumstances Max would have been dead last without the Red Flag and then nothing suggests he would be able to pass everyone considering he couldn't pass Leclerc not to mention he would be stuck in the dirty air. I will agree that he would have been on the top 10 but not in the podium places.

Good job for his masterful race but let's not overexxagerate.
Didn't want to talk about a non Mclaren driver here, but there are some factual errors above -
To go from P17 to P6 and get to the tail of LeClerc, Max overtook 9 cars (there were just 2 vacant spots on the grid, not 4). Then he got lucky that he didn't have to overtake LeClerc, Tsunoda, Norris, Russel, because they all pitted. The only other overtake he did was Ocon after the second safety car. So overall 10 overtakes in total (2 did not start, 3 started behind ; to account for a total of 19 cars other than himself).

However, the matter of high praise for him is not really about the 'number of overtakes' anyway.

All the mainstream/social media hype about this 'verstappen masterclass' is 90% by people who don't understand racing , but from those 10% who actually understand, it is not about the P17 or the number of overtakes etc.. It's about the cleverness and skill involved in how different the lines he chose to drive were (for example the outside T3 passing of 3-4 cars in first lap was reminiscent of the same thing from brazil 2016 ; another example was how much kerb he was taking on T12 to straighten before applying full throttle for sector3) , about how he was braking into T1 and yet not locking up his fronts, and how smooth the inputs were for all the sector2 turns. The car wasn't eccentrically loaded at any point where he had to saw at the steering wheel to wrestle back the car (of course, don't know what he was doing with his feet because we can't see it on the onboard footage). As a result his tyres were in much better shape than anyone.
Yes he got lucky with red flag ; yes, many of the laptimes (until the 2nd safety car) were very similar to Russel/Norris. But it was the way in which those laptimes were achieved without punishing the car/tyres.
All the praise across the paddock from 'people in the know' is really about how differently he was driving to everyone else. It's not about the 'how much gap' or 'how many places' or any such measurable numbers.
Max was great, but Pierre Gasly got from 15th to 3rd in an Alpine! An Alpine! Phenomenal, probably drive of the day, due to the total comparative nature of what they were driving.

Ben1980
Ben1980
1
Joined: 19 Jun 2022, 10:11

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

basti313 wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 21:05
Ben1980 wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 19:33
Drivers rarely jump into front running cars, and when they do it's about learning.
I have never seen a driver jump into a front running or whatever car and bottling the starts with this consistency. Did you see Leclerc or Russel doing regularly bad starts?
I mean....even if you are not the best starter, getting more starts well than bad should be a possibility for a F1 driver. I really feel sorry, but this is a running gag, not something "about learning".

Same for strategy. They had two wet races this season and bottled the strategy in both. How do you want to learn this? There is no learning, you have one or two races per year. That is a topic of awareness and being a midfield team is nothing one would accept as a reason for being unaware. I do not believe Zak is happy with the explanation on "we were in the midfield" for bottling the strategy...
The problem with your arguments is you keep saying bottled. And I don't think anyone really bottling anything, and that generally makes most of your points just pointless.

I just think saying bottled is just being lazy. But, each to their own.

Ben1980
Ben1980
1
Joined: 19 Jun 2022, 10:11

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

basti313 wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 23:01
ScuderiaLeo wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 22:38
basti313 wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 21:05
I have never seen a driver jump into a front running or whatever car and bottling the starts with this consistency. Did you see Leclerc or Russel doing regularly bad starts?
I mean....even if you are not the best starter, getting more starts well than bad should be a possibility for a F1 driver. I really feel sorry, but this is a running gag, not something "about learning".

Same for strategy. They had two wet races this season and bottled the strategy in both. How do you want to learn this? There is no learning, you have one or two races per year. That is a topic of awareness and being a midfield team is nothing one would accept as a reason for being unaware. I do not believe Zak is happy with the explanation on "we were in the midfield" for bottling the strategy...
To be fair to Norris... despite Russell's excellence in this past race, he isn't actually a very good starter on average. His net positions on start is in the negatives. Sainz is also in the negatives. It's not like Norris is the only driver semi-consistently losing positions on starts.
No, he is the worst. By far, outliers removed, he is the worst current driver on the first lap:
https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comme ... /#lightbox

daren_p wrote:
04 Nov 2024, 21:39
On the initial start, do we know yet if it was actually Lando's fault?
Come on...
Do you think Magnussen is the best starter in F1?

User avatar
BMMR61
0
Joined: 25 May 2021, 13:02
Location: Australia.

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Darth-Piekus wrote:
05 Nov 2024, 09:32
Do you think that Lando Norris dipped in form this year in race starts, racecraft and strategical thinking compared to 2021, 2022 and 2023?
No.

Lando's limitations have been exposed by being at or near the front frequently, AND especially against a battle-hardened competitor and his tough-as-nails team. The team said what their goals for 2024 were and many scoffed - a few wins, frequent podiums? Yeah! Tick that off. The learning of what it takes to challenge for a title is under way (in the fire) and it should be in no doubt what tough guys the Red Bull team are. That we are leading the WCC is mainly down to Sergio Perez who is clearly on the downslope. Can we have realistic expectations about Lando and the team? No, I suppose that isn't a realistic expectation, :lol: , given the inexperience of many of the forum people. How many have competed in motorsport either on track or behind the scenes? Very few I would guess. There were so many points raised in the post disappointment stage of the week that was, too many to try to answer right now. However, it's surely fair to say, reality has just dawned on people - McLaren and Lando aren't good enough to take on Max. That we have almost now defeated Red Bull is extraordinary. This is a great team in the making.

Ben1980
Ben1980
1
Joined: 19 Jun 2022, 10:11

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

When did Mclaren ladt beat Red Bull in the WCC?

Emag
Emag
84
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Ben1980 wrote:
05 Nov 2024, 12:45
When did Mclaren ladt beat Red Bull in the WCC?
2008 :lol:

avantman
avantman
10
Joined: 07 Dec 2020, 19:17

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Lando is great of a driver, not so much of a racer if you understand what that means. He lacks a lot on multiple components that can ultimately be combined by the term the 'racecraft'. Starts and performances on the first lap is just one of those, far from the most important ones. And no, this isn't what costed him title this year. It goes far deeper. I think it is in the head.

User avatar
mwillems
44
Joined: 04 Sep 2016, 22:11

Re: 2024 Mclaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Martin Brundle giving a balanced opinion on Lando. Suggests like many that championship experience is lacking, but also suggest that he lacks the required killer instinct. This is what I mean by being a bit more savvy and robust on track.

https://www.planetf1.com/news/martin-br ... aws-brutal
I'm not taking advice from a cartoon dog

-Bandit