2024 São Paulo Grand Prix - Interlagos, Nov 01 - 03

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
basti313
basti313
28
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 14:49

Re: 2024 São Paulo Grand Prix - Interlagos, Nov 01 - 03

Post

Watto wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 12:47
If you were the main beneficiary of an incident where a SC is called and pit because of it where perhaps your opponent who pitted maybe 10-15 laps earlier is stuck between do we pit and give up more track position or say out and hope we can get a big enough gap where the tyre offset come back to bite. Maintain the same position as you were both with fresh tyres and a level playing field from then on in
Well, but this is part of race management, right? Usually an early stop profits under the point of undercut and gaps with fresh tires. Staying out with the SC chance is a strategic discission.
Don`t russel the hamster!

Watto
Watto
4
Joined: 10 Mar 2022, 15:12

Re: 2024 São Paulo Grand Prix - Interlagos, Nov 01 - 03

Post

basti313 wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 14:02
Watto wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 12:47
If you were the main beneficiary of an incident where a SC is called and pit because of it where perhaps your opponent who pitted maybe 10-15 laps earlier is stuck between do we pit and give up more track position or say out and hope we can get a big enough gap where the tyre offset come back to bite. Maintain the same position as you were both with fresh tyres and a level playing field from then on in
Well, but this is part of race management, right? Usually an early stop profits under the point of undercut and gaps with fresh tires. Staying out with the SC chance is a strategic discission.
Of course.

My overall point is that they can both be considered playing at luck.If people complain about red flags and the ability to change tyres - largely but not completely because my fav driver was disadvantaged. Then IMO you have to accept sometimes the SC has the exact same effect.

basti313
basti313
28
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 14:49

Re: 2024 São Paulo Grand Prix - Interlagos, Nov 01 - 03

Post

Watto wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 14:58
basti313 wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 14:02
Watto wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 12:47
If you were the main beneficiary of an incident where a SC is called and pit because of it where perhaps your opponent who pitted maybe 10-15 laps earlier is stuck between do we pit and give up more track position or say out and hope we can get a big enough gap where the tyre offset come back to bite. Maintain the same position as you were both with fresh tyres and a level playing field from then on in
Well, but this is part of race management, right? Usually an early stop profits under the point of undercut and gaps with fresh tires. Staying out with the SC chance is a strategic discission.
Of course.

My overall point is that they can both be considered playing at luck.If people complain about red flags and the ability to change tyres - largely but not completely because my fav driver was disadvantaged. Then IMO you have to accept sometimes the SC has the exact same effect.
Yes, it is the same. You can gamble on SC chance, the same as you can gamble on a red flag as we have seen it in Saudi.
I do not think the words "disadvantaged" or "luck" that are now used are really correct as it is strategic discissions.

So I do not think Lando or McLaren can complain about "luck". They can complain about the way they were driven into their strategic discission and the strategic discissions of others. But everything including the red flag chance was on the table.
Don`t russel the hamster!

venkyhere
venkyhere
16
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: 2024 São Paulo Grand Prix - Interlagos, Nov 01 - 03

Post

there is so much postmortem about 'red flag tyre change' rules, how it is unfair etc etc...

I wonder how many of us listened to the different team radios around the time when the 'dangerous weather VSC' was called - if not yet seen, it's available somewhere in the middle of 'Jolyon Palmer's analysis' in F1tv where almost all team radios are played. That itself is a resounding summary of what attitude each driver had, about driving in those conditions. Visibility was almost nil, and race control tried their best, with an actual safety car, to avoid red flag, even though it was 'undriveable' (not because of the water alone, mostly because of the spray which is tremendous in this ground effect era) and was easy 'red-flag-the-race' conditions.

The super-late, yet perfectly timed red flag in quali, the refusal to red flag the race, the refusal to 'decide then and there' and wait for end of race, to NOT hand out time penalty for a clear breach of start procedure, all were aimed to 'make the championship interesting' (there is no 'special love' towards Norris or 'special hate' for Verstappen, the aim is to manipulate as much as possible, to 'make the championship fight' go down to the wire). Unfortunately, Colapinto crashed and forced the hand of race control, to actually call a red flag. That gave an advantage to Verstappen, and despite their best efforts, almost killed the WDC fight.
This is what happened. And we are going in circles discussing the same thing again and again.

Watto
Watto
4
Joined: 10 Mar 2022, 15:12

Re: 2024 São Paulo Grand Prix - Interlagos, Nov 01 - 03

Post

basti313 wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 16:21
Watto wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 14:58
basti313 wrote:
15 Nov 2024, 14:02

Well, but this is part of race management, right? Usually an early stop profits under the point of undercut and gaps with fresh tires. Staying out with the SC chance is a strategic discission.
Of course.

My overall point is that they can both be considered playing at luck.If people complain about red flags and the ability to change tyres - largely but not completely because my fav driver was disadvantaged. Then IMO you have to accept sometimes the SC has the exact same effect.
Yes, it is the same. You can gamble on SC chance, the same as you can gamble on a red flag as we have seen it in Saudi.
I do not think the words "disadvantaged" or "luck" that are now used are really correct as it is strategic discissions.

So I do not think Lando or McLaren can complain about "luck". They can complain about the way they were driven into their strategic discission and the strategic discissions of others. But everything including the red flag chance was on the table.
And this was really the point I was making.

I don't think you can say waiting for a red flag was luck and dismiss waiting for a safety car as tactical. They both have the same overall effect. Using a SC/Red Flag that can change the outcome of a race. Considering I think waiting for a SC is a tactic pretty routinely used and accepted then I tend to see red flags as the same thing.

Espresso
Espresso
7
Joined: 13 Dec 2017, 15:03

Re: 2024 São Paulo Grand Prix - Interlagos, Nov 01 - 03

Post

venkyhere wrote:
16 Nov 2024, 09:26
The super-late, yet perfectly timed red flag in quali, the refusal to red flag the race, the refusal to 'decide then and there' and wait for end of race, to NOT hand out time penalty for a clear breach of start procedure, all were aimed to 'make the championship interesting' (there is no 'special love' towards Norris or 'special hate' for Verstappen, the aim is to manipulate as much as possible, to 'make the championship fight' go down to the wire). Unfortunately, Colapinto crashed and forced the hand of race control, to actually call a red flag. That gave an advantage to Verstappen, and despite their best efforts, almost killed the WDC fight.
This is what happened. And we are going in circles discussing the same thing again and again.
Kudos!!! Perfectly worded! It‘s not about fair stewarding but about commercial value.