Well, corporates can have 30% that can be fired, but government is about 80%
Well, corporates can have 30% that can be fired, but government is about 80%
I wouldn't tell that chassis design is quite good. They barely managed to match Haas and Vcarb - their pure pace is quite similar. Ok, it means that their chassis it better, what comprehents lack in power. But still they lack od clear 1 second to top 4 teams and only 0,2 is due to engine.
It was always always going to happen, Renault engine is just far too slow compared to others.CaribouBread wrote: ↑12 Nov 2024, 13:35BWT Alpine Formula One Team and Mercedes-Benz sign Power Unit and Gearbox agreements. From 26 onwards up to at least 2030.
They know that the 2026 regs are just an even more expensive and even more complicated double down on the 2014 regs. Which they had nothing to show for but tire tracks on their back. But it was partly their own fault for being a staunch driver of those regs in the first place.LHamilton wrote: ↑12 Nov 2024, 22:02I do wonder if this might have to do with Alpine thinking that the 2026 regs wont be a good experience overall, and not only for them themselves. What I mean by that is, is that I wonder if Alpine might be thinking that the 2026 engine regs might be scrapped quicker than expected. The reason for this is that the regs have not been welcomed with a lot of enthusiasm from drivers and probably engineers.
The fear of that drivers having to change down gear(s) in the middle of a straight to recharge batteries, maybe more fuel saving etc. All things that could affect the racing to a degree that a lot of people dont seem it feasable to continue with it. And who knows what problems (or lack there of) might occur (or not occur) in the future.
All very much speculation, of course. But if Alpine have these thoughts in mind, they might have a case for not putting vast amount of money into an engine development that they dont believe in, that perhaps wont last very much long at all.
Personally, I go into 2026 with trepidation. I fear it might not be a good way to go with F1. But lets see.. And perhaps my fears, along with drivers and the like, have influenced my thinking in regards to the matter of Alpine.
You also have three well respected drivers that are on the precipice of retireing. Alonso & Hamilton primarily, but perhaps also Verstappen. (You could also put Hulkenberg as a potential retiree, but most people wouldnt care if he did, so not really apt in this conversation.) Three drivers that would leave, at this moment in time, quite a hole to fill if they were to retire close to 2026/2027, citing regulations as a factor in their decision(s). Again, worse case scenario. Perhaps none if these will come true.
Why ? What is the point ?TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑14 Nov 2024, 03:36https://x.com/Formula_Nerds/status/1856789490871767107
"Ok… the plot thickens with regard to the Alpine rumours earlier.
We have heard tonight from a very trusted source (which we cannot name) that the Alpine could disappear and be replaced with the name HiTech!
Oakes would remain. That’s all we know, more sure will follow. #F1"
But that won't be a french team anymore? It will be British team again as PreRenault 2016TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑21 Nov 2024, 20:41^ Yeah. I hope they stay as Alpine. I like the aesthetic of the team. Plus it would be a loss to F1 to lose an unmistakably French team. If I was F1, I would do anything I can to support the team to keep them in the series.
The truth is that the difference is not that big actually BUT they have less power than others. This decision was based mostly on the financial aspect nothing else.stephen wrote: ↑12 Nov 2024, 16:19It was always always going to happen, Renault engine is just far too slow compared to others.CaribouBread wrote: ↑12 Nov 2024, 13:35BWT Alpine Formula One Team and Mercedes-Benz sign Power Unit and Gearbox agreements. From 26 onwards up to at least 2030.