As a Ferrari fan, I also have such hopes, as it'll be easier for them in WCC
He's had his "mojo" for about 10 races in his entire red bull stint of 4 years, 80 races.
Sure buddy. Every year blud drops one good race at Baku and blames eferything else.
Yeah, this is the right take. VER wasn't divebombing, he was well within his rights to attack an open corner. Piastri simply took the racing line ignoring a car on the inside. That said, Piastri did live exactly enough room that without understeer, VER might have made it. The understeer caused the collision and hence the penalty.organic wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 20:54The only miscalculation in the race today was Oscar not giving Max more room. Oscar had far more to lose in that collision and brought a lot of jeopardy into the WCC fight. It was silly not to yieldtrinidefender wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 20:52Disagree on the pathetic penalty. It's been shown countless times that a 5 second penalty for something like this isn't a hindrance many times and if it means keeping the position but getting the penalty it's usually worth it by race end. That effectively encourages drivers to play bumper cars. At least 10 seconds encourages drivers to be more clean under threat of a penalty that will actually affect their race.
Max will have to learn how to race in a pack of other cars without always hitting them. If he can't do that then maybe he isn't as good as everyone thinks he is
I think the wins gloss over the simple fact that we didnt have the best car after China in a single race.Vettel165 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 21:02Who cares about today, Max brought the WDC home. We had equal pace than Mercedes in this race. Ferrari, Mclaren were just quicker. But I didnt expect two wins in the last races, quite an improvement. A year started well, and ended well. But we need to improve in many areas for 2025.
I would even question if he had his "mojo" in 10 races?
Yes. Checo in his Force India days was certainly no bad driver, and his podiums and first win show that he was certainly capable of seizing opportunities when possible. But it seems he just has low adaptability, and at an RB team where they try to max-imize the car, that's gonna bite.basti313 wrote: ↑09 Dec 2024, 12:09I would even question if he had his "mojo" in 10 races?
There were times, when the RedBull was the dominating car, so Perez did well especially in slippery conditions when others were struggling even more. Beginning 2023 as an example, which looked not bad, just to be schooled like no other teammate before in F1 history in Miami...
Looking back...more than the Spore win, I see not much where he really showed some excellence.
This implies that TSU is getting the seat next to Max which I really hope will be the case. I don't see it happening though. Based off the comments from Marko in the last week, I doubt it will happen.
The rules as they are currently written say the car ahead at the apex (whether inside or outside) has rights to the corner. Piastri was ahead at the corner apex.f1isgood wrote: ↑09 Dec 2024, 12:02Yeah, this is the right take. VER wasn't divebombing, he was well within his rights to attack an open corner. Piastri simply took the racing line ignoring a car on the inside. That said, Piastri did live exactly enough room that without understeer, VER might have made it. The understeer caused the collision and hence the penalty.organic wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 20:54The only miscalculation in the race today was Oscar not giving Max more room. Oscar had far more to lose in that collision and brought a lot of jeopardy into the WCC fight. It was silly not to yieldtrinidefender wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 20:52
Disagree on the pathetic penalty. It's been shown countless times that a 5 second penalty for something like this isn't a hindrance many times and if it means keeping the position but getting the penalty it's usually worth it by race end. That effectively encourages drivers to play bumper cars. At least 10 seconds encourages drivers to be more clean under threat of a penalty that will actually affect their race.
Max will have to learn how to race in a pack of other cars without always hitting them. If he can't do that then maybe he isn't as good as everyone thinks he is
That said, it's a L1T1 racing incident. FIA are just being dumb about this. Obviously most people's hatred for Max doesn't allow them to argue in a middle-ground.
Those two cars were racing alongside each other. You can be 1mm ahead at the apex or 10cm and for all practical purposes even 1m and that doesn't mean the car on the inside will simply disappear.trinidefender wrote: ↑09 Dec 2024, 15:40The rules as they are currently written say the car ahead at the apex (whether inside or outside) has rights to the corner. Piastri was ahead at the corner apex.f1isgood wrote: ↑09 Dec 2024, 12:02Yeah, this is the right take. VER wasn't divebombing, he was well within his rights to attack an open corner. Piastri simply took the racing line ignoring a car on the inside. That said, Piastri did live exactly enough room that without understeer, VER might have made it. The understeer caused the collision and hence the penalty.
That said, it's a L1T1 racing incident. FIA are just being dumb about this. Obviously most people's hatred for Max doesn't allow them to argue in a middle-ground.
The L1T1 incidents thing is being taken a bit far. Leniency there should only be shown when it is confusing what is actually going on. Here it was very clear cut and only involved two cars, this incident is no different from one that happened later in the race.
Do I like the way the rules are currently enforced? Not really but that’s the precedent that’s been set.
That is the most slapstick part of this season. The document is called "Driving Standard Guidelines".
Piastri could not see Ver when it counted. Similar to Ver to Rus, this is a completely blind spot on the inside as long as the inside car is not fully alongside.
Well...I would see two differences:
I don’t think you can take the racing line while leaving space. He left space, he has no obligation to help Max with his attempt at an overtake, all of Piastri’s obligations were fulfilled. Max is a 4x WDC and he knows he’s going to understeer there. 10s penalty is the right penalty, Vettel got a few of them during his T1 spin cycle.f1isgood wrote:Yeah, this is the right take. VER wasn't divebombing, he was well within his rights to attack an open corner. Piastri simply took the racing line ignoring a car on the inside. That said, Piastri did live exactly enough room that without understeer, VER might have made it. The understeer caused the collision and hence the penalty.organic wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 20:54The only miscalculation in the race today was Oscar not giving Max more room. Oscar had far more to lose in that collision and brought a lot of jeopardy into the WCC fight. It was silly not to yieldtrinidefender wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 20:52Disagree on the pathetic penalty. It's been shown countless times that a 5 second penalty for something like this isn't a hindrance many times and if it means keeping the position but getting the penalty it's usually worth it by race end. That effectively encourages drivers to play bumper cars. At least 10 seconds encourages drivers to be more clean under threat of a penalty that will actually affect their race.
Max will have to learn how to race in a pack of other cars without always hitting them. If he can't do that then maybe he isn't as good as everyone thinks he is
That said, it's a L1T1 racing incident. FIA are just being dumb about this. Obviously most people's hatred for Max doesn't allow them to argue in a middle-ground.