outer_bongolia wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 18:24Are they getting rid of DRS and replacing it with extra power?
I would love if they just increased the drag of the cars so that the car close behind would have a few tenths' worth of extra on the straights without a gimmick (something like preventing outwash on the front tires, minimum nose width, minimum front wing height, ...). Of course it would need to be something adjustable throughout a season to prevent the passes from being too easy.
Longer times on the straights means more time to get alongside and pass under braking. Blow by passes won't happen due to the lack of DRS. The massive lack of battery power means they might be able to enable overtake mode for a few seconds to try and get alongside car in front, but if they keep it on any longer, they will be slow on the next lap and will probably get reovertaken. Cars with less downforce and narrower tyres will be a lot more nervous, similar to the 2009 and 2014-16 cars, which means more ability to battle in the corners as well.
That's not actually good for overtaking. It means a stronger concertina effect that means it'll be farther down the straight before the car behind starts going faster than the car ahead, meaning there's a shorter distance to actually get alongside.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 23:03They will just be really slow under acceleration, like laughably slow, but that is a large part of why they will produce good racing.
I don't think the radius/number of section rules are changing significantly so should doSeanspeed wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 23:53That's not actually good for overtaking. It means a stronger concertina effect that means it'll be farther down the straight before the car behind starts going faster than the car ahead, meaning there's a shorter distance to actually get alongside.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 23:03They will just be really slow under acceleration, like laughably slow, but that is a large part of why they will produce good racing.
I think we'll be clamoring for DRS back again before too long. DRS got a bad rap, but it was so often poorly balanced in terms of how much of it was allowed on a given track, and was especially bad when it was given to cars on back-to-back longer straights.
They will be very fast at accelerating - that's where the maximum ERS deployment will be used the most.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 23:03They will just be really slow under acceleration, like laughably slow, but that is a large part of why they will produce good racing.
wuzak wrote: ↑13 Dec 2024, 12:50They will be very fast at accelerating - that's where the maximum ERS deployment will be used the most.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 23:03They will just be really slow under acceleration, like laughably slow, but that is a large part of why they will produce good racing.
It will be like the LMP1s from the 2010s. Though, perhaps, without the speed plateauing very early on the straight.
Why isn't the front suspension symmetrical ??McLarenHonda wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 09:29The FIA posted this today! This is probably the last spec of the 2026 aero rules.
Rendering mistake. The pull rod just got forgotten on one sidestewie325 wrote: ↑13 Dec 2024, 20:32Why isn't the front suspension symmetrical ??McLarenHonda wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 09:29The FIA posted this today! This is probably the last spec of the 2026 aero rules.
What a machine. You could hear that bad boy clear as day when it fully deployedFW17 wrote: ↑13 Dec 2024, 13:35wuzak wrote: ↑13 Dec 2024, 12:50They will be very fast at accelerating - that's where the maximum ERS deployment will be used the most.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 23:03They will just be really slow under acceleration, like laughably slow, but that is a large part of why they will produce good racing.
It will be like the LMP1s from the 2010s. Though, perhaps, without the speed plateauing very early on the straight.
Like the porsche 919 evo