They will have an overdrive for cars less than 1 sec behind, so DRS is done but replaced by a push to pass system.r85 wrote: ↑16 Dec 2024, 10:56Can't wait to see how the overtaking changes because DRS flyby overtakes will be gone. I don't think it will be simple ERS overtakes either, because battery management will be a bigger variable in these new regs.
I'm hoping for more teams to be in race win contention because eliminating ground effect should make the cars easier to understand and develop, especially for Mercedes. These cars should be pushed to the limit like the older generation(s), it's a joke that drivers can't push as hard as they want in qualifying laps.
I honestly quite like the idea of active aero, assuming it can be made safe.Jambier wrote: ↑16 Dec 2024, 13:00
They will have an overdrive for cars less than 1 sec behind, so DRS is done but replaced by a push to pass system.
I like the idea of smaller cars ( do we know if wheels will go to 16' or stay 18' ?), ligher and getting rid of MGU H but:
- The big part of EV I'm not fan, there no use of it
- I believe they will not succeed to make the cars 30kg lighter due to battery
- They are already speaking about the 2030 engine with no hybrid
So it feels like the engines rules are really the bad part. Of course, active aero also but this is caused by the EV part.
The plan appears to be that the car that uses override mode gets an extra 0.5MJ or allowed recovery for that lap.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑16 Dec 2024, 15:06I honestly quite like the idea of active aero, assuming it can be made safe.Jambier wrote: ↑16 Dec 2024, 13:00
They will have an overdrive for cars less than 1 sec behind, so DRS is done but replaced by a push to pass system.
I like the idea of smaller cars ( do we know if wheels will go to 16' or stay 18' ?), ligher and getting rid of MGU H but:
- The big part of EV I'm not fan, there no use of it
- I believe they will not succeed to make the cars 30kg lighter due to battery
- They are already speaking about the 2030 engine with no hybrid
So it feels like the engines rules are really the bad part. Of course, active aero also but this is caused by the EV part.
Imagine the 2020 cars with front and rear DRS. They would be absolutely outrageously fast, probably pushing >400kph at the end of longer straights, assuming gear ratios were modified.
Active aero only works if you replace DRS with something else though. Push to pass is a great solution, since it forces more energy management and requires a car that overtakes to defend the lap following the overtake, since it will be short on ERS.
I don't think 0.5MJ will make a significant difference. From what I've heard they're unlikely to reach the recovery limit anyway, at least before fuel burning and extra fuel was introduced.wuzak wrote: ↑17 Dec 2024, 14:04The plan appears to be that the car that uses override mode gets an extra 0.5MJ or allowed recovery for that lap.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑16 Dec 2024, 15:06I honestly quite like the idea of active aero, assuming it can be made safe.Jambier wrote: ↑16 Dec 2024, 13:00
They will have an overdrive for cars less than 1 sec behind, so DRS is done but replaced by a push to pass system.
I like the idea of smaller cars ( do we know if wheels will go to 16' or stay 18' ?), ligher and getting rid of MGU H but:
- The big part of EV I'm not fan, there no use of it
- I believe they will not succeed to make the cars 30kg lighter due to battery
- They are already speaking about the 2030 engine with no hybrid
So it feels like the engines rules are really the bad part. Of course, active aero also but this is caused by the EV part.
Imagine the 2020 cars with front and rear DRS. They would be absolutely outrageously fast, probably pushing >400kph at the end of longer straights, assuming gear ratios were modified.
Active aero only works if you replace DRS with something else though. Push to pass is a great solution, since it forces more energy management and requires a car that overtakes to defend the lap following the overtake, since it will be short on ERS.
It would be preferable, IMO, to not give them the extra energy.
What was “Gen 1” then? 1950?theriusDR3 wrote: ↑16 Dec 2024, 10:35https://formularapida.net/wp-content/up ... AAzw3o.jpg
The Formula 1 "Gen 15" car
https://www.motorsportweek.com/wp-conte ... Res-1.webp
Currently known as "Gen 14" car package
In terms of generational, the Formula 1 2026-2030 car package generation will known as "Gen 15"! Currently Formula 1 still utilizing "Gen 14" car package from 2022 to 2025.
Do you like the "Gen 15" Formula 1 car?
1950 was Gen 1McLarenHonda wrote: ↑18 Dec 2024, 10:00What was “Gen 1” then? 1950?theriusDR3 wrote: ↑16 Dec 2024, 10:35https://formularapida.net/wp-content/up ... AAzw3o.jpg
The Formula 1 "Gen 15" car
https://www.motorsportweek.com/wp-conte ... Res-1.webp
Currently known as "Gen 14" car package
In terms of generational, the Formula 1 2026-2030 car package generation will known as "Gen 15"! Currently Formula 1 still utilizing "Gen 14" car package from 2022 to 2025.
Do you like the "Gen 15" Formula 1 car?
well ....theriusDR3 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2024, 10:221950 was Gen 1
1959 was Gen 2
1969 was Gen 3
1973 was Gen 4
1980 was Gen 5
1984 was Gen 6
1989 was Gen 7
1995 was Gen 8
1998 was Gen 9
2006 was Gen 10
2009 was Gen 11
2014 was Gen 12
2017 was Gen 13
2022 was Gen 14