mnauno wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025, 17:34
I know that it is a flat-12 engine, but most of the time people on the internet are saying that it is a boxer engine which would be a little different to a 180 degree V12. Thats why I was wondering if they actually tried the boxer layout, which would have more disadvantages than advantages in this case.
I think it boils down to the fact some people simply do not understand the key difference between a boxer and a flat engine ( i like to call a flat engine a "180deg vee" even when a 180deg bank obviously does not display a V ) .
The main benefit of a boxer is very good engine balance from quite a small footprint , e.g a 6cyl boxer is perfectly balanced in primary and secondary order reciprocating and rotating plane - like an inline 6 - while a v6 is not .
To build a 12cyl boxer makes no sense since a v12 is also perfectly balanced in all planes but you have the bigger bank offset so more overall lenght and more weight in a boxer compared to a 180 deg vee .
I think nobody ever designed a 12cyl boxer , in no application .
Imho the only boxer engine in f1 was the 1962 porsche 804 with a 1.5litre 8cyl .