Glad to be proven right.
wasn't Antonelli on a 3-stopper? He took (used) softs with 30 laps to gobananapeel23 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 20:15Horrific luck. He wasn't on for a podium or anything, but he would probably have finished P6 or P7 without the safety car and Mercedes making strategy blunders.
Ridiculous judgement. As if you need to gain an advantage to be penalized. NOR didn’t gain 3 spots because he started 10cm ahead of his box.zeph wrote:Russell is in the clear, no further action.
If Russell would get DSQ for it then so would Leclerc. He had a similar experience with DRS opening well outside of the drs zones in this racedialtone wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 22:11Ridiculous judgement. As if you need to gain an advantage to be penalized. NOR didn’t gain 3 spots because he started 10cm ahead of his box.zeph wrote:Russell is in the clear, no further action.
Max touching Lewis car didn’t gain or lose anything for either car.
Unserious.
I think dialtone is just looking for a level of consistency. If you can let the DRS slide you could let the "one tire contact patch" slide. Or penalize them all from a sporting code requirement. Its just all over the place. I could even go on about track limits at turn 4 but wont bring that up again.organic wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 22:29If Russell would get DSQ for it then so would Leclerc. He had a similar experience with DRS opening well outside of the drs zones in this racedialtone wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 22:11Ridiculous judgement. As if you need to gain an advantage to be penalized. NOR didn’t gain 3 spots because he started 10cm ahead of his box.zeph wrote:Russell is in the clear, no further action.
Max touching Lewis car didn’t gain or lose anything for either car.
Unserious.
Nor, Rus and Lec all had drs on in the wrong spot, and it was due to Rus car being broken. I’m not sure why other drivers should be penalized for rus car being brokenorganic wrote:If Russell would get DSQ for it then so would Leclerc. He had a similar experience with DRS opening well outside of the drs zones in this racedialtone wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 22:11Ridiculous judgement. As if you need to gain an advantage to be penalized. NOR didn’t gain 3 spots because he started 10cm ahead of his box.zeph wrote:Russell is in the clear, no further action.
Max touching Lewis car didn’t gain or lose anything for either car.
Unserious.
It's shocking how much pace Piastri found in one off season, no idea what changed, but suddenly he looks like he has the edge in qualy pace(race administration is no problem for him either), even when he lost the battle in Suzuka it looked like if they play that again he would be the one to get it.venkyhere wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 20:24
Overall impressions :
1. Piastri has surely gotten into the head of Norris. No matter how he smiles, he knows Piastri is mentally tougher than him and skill wise, has improved a lot since his debut in 2023. Norris must have also realized that he has a long way to go, in terms of 'race-craft'. In wheel to wheel racing, both LeClerc and Russel had his number. Easily. How long did it take him to realize that T4 was the better overtaking spot, not T1, given the lower top speed that the McLaren had ?
Teams are really at the limit with current rules, upgrades won't bring them what simply running lower will.
Really? Norris got saved by favorable stewards several times and then only *barely* reconciled things even with a massively dominant car.zeph wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 20:10Agree. Norris did well enough to salvage P3 from a mediocre weekend. He should have passed Russell, maybe, but that dude just was ON it today.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 18:57Russell baited him into that. Great work by Russell. Offer him half a chance on the outside only to close it immediately and thus destroy NOR chances into T4.
Reading this it comes across that this is about an outcome that you didn’t want, more than a consistency problem.dialtone wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 22:46Nor, Rus and Lec all had drs on in the wrong spot, and it was due to Rus car being broken. I’m not sure why other drivers should be penalized for rus car being brokenorganic wrote:If Russell would get DSQ for it then so would Leclerc. He had a similar experience with DRS opening well outside of the drs zones in this race
This seems to be very track dependent. In Australia and China, RB and Mercs were pretty equal in pace, as the second fastest car. The RB easily second fastest car in Japan, if driven optimally, but slowest of the top 4 in Bahrain.venkyhere wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025, 20:24
7. Redbull don't just have a bad car after their correlation issues hitting them hard, they have suddenly become bad in 'race operations' (slow pitstop in Japan, total meltdown with the stops today, poor decision making to preserve two H instead of two M through the FPs). This is the real position of Redbull in the pecking order - 4th fastest car, barely clearing midfielder cars like Alpine and Haas.