Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

TBH at first it was and now I re-read your post I realise it should be pointed at the other person quoted! :oops:

F1 should be about racing first and engineering solutions second.
CMSMJ1 wrote:Don't know if that is posted at me axle?

My point being that F1 does ont need manufacturers to use it for their ideas and testing.

F1 needs people to make fast chassis and put the fastest engine in them.
- Axle

User avatar
tarzoon
0
Joined: 17 May 2006, 19:53
Location: White and blue football club

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

RH1300S wrote: To race????
That's utopic! (being ironic here)

If you want to see races, go and watch F2, Fx, WRC, MotoGP.

If you want to see the best cars, drivers, euro-trash glamour, crazy-ass ideas being cut-off from root, shitloads of money being wasted, jolly old spanking, strategy, lightning fast pit stops and brilliant engineering when rules allow, you're in the right place.

Personally, if it wasn't for these technical forums and discussions, I'm not sure if I would watch any F1 at all.

User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

Who's going to buy Toyota F1?

(that bong marks 1000 millibongs in the Cheech scale, flyn. Caramba!)
Ciro

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

Ciro Pabón wrote:Who's going to buy Toyota F1?

(that bong marks 1000 millibongs in the Cheech scale, flyn. Caramba!)
its not mine I swear

User avatar
pjobmathew
0
Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 09:09

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

Very sad for Toyota and Kobayashi . I was under the impression that asian countries had the global credit crunch licked (well , at least by now #-o )

Anyway i would like some budget caps , higher than the ones proposed earlier and more open regulations that lead to improvement in road technology . I know its too easy for me to sit here and say all this but what is the point in investing millions on something that will never benefit the common man :?: This will encourage manufacturers to join F1 . It will also make life easier for independent teams . Most importantly it will give almost every one the chance to do well .

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

That is absolutely fascinating.
Read through this thread, you will find that almost all the posters do not know what the purpose of F1 is.
I hope it is not just to race and go vrm vrm.
There are plenty of ways to race and the vrm vrm is now out of fashion.
I hope somebody can define the purpose, or it has little future.

RacingManiac
RacingManiac
9
Joined: 22 Nov 2004, 02:29

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

IMO the purpose was defined by the end user, and in each era its a bit different. Grand Prix started out maybe as a place where boundary can be pushed, but throughout much of 60s and 70s it seems to be rather as just another racing formula. Then with more manufacturers in the late 70s into the 80s it starts to move towards R&D again. Now it looks like with the OEs pulling out it'll be back to racing again....

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

If it is just going to be racing, then does it matter what the drivers race?
Does the technology matter at all?

User avatar
gcdugas
3
Joined: 19 Sep 2006, 21:48

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

autogyro wrote:If it is just going to be racing, then does it matter what the drivers race?
Does the technology matter at all?

Nope and that is where Max missed the plot. And to be fair Bernie's and Max's views are somewhat skewed by their involvement in the Cosworth era of the 70's. I don't think either really grasped the significance of the "manufacturers era". But that is my opinion.
Innovation over refinement is the prefered path to performance. -- Get rid of the dopey regs in F1

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

gcdugas wrote:
autogyro wrote:If it is just going to be racing, then does it matter what the drivers race?
Does the technology matter at all?

Nope and that is where Max missed the plot. And to be fair Bernie's and Max's views are somewhat skewed by their involvement in the Cosworth era of the 70's. I don't think either really grasped the significance of the "manufacturers era". But that is my opinion.
Good comment but there still seems to be no definition of what F1 is.
Fota IMO is as remote from that reality as anyone else and the car manufacturers are on a different planet altogether.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

gcdugas wrote:Nope and that is where Max missed the plot. And to be fair Bernie's and Max's views are somewhat skewed by their involvement in the Cosworth era of the 70's. I don't think either really grasped the significance of the "manufacturers era". But that is my opinion.
This is funny. Those poor sods obviously did not have a fraction of the mental capacity required to work their way across 50 different internet fora daily and post the same pompous opinion everywhere. Instead they had to satisfy their little egos by creating the most successfull racing series on the planet.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
gcdugas
3
Joined: 19 Sep 2006, 21:48

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:This is funny. Those poor sods obviously did not have a fraction of the mental capacity required to work their way across 50 different internet fora daily and post the same pompous opinion everywhere. Instead they had to satisfy their little egos by creating the most successfull racing series on the planet.
Bernie and Max didn't "create" a thing. They just happened to be in the right place at the right time. It would have happened no matter who played their roles. This is just my opinion but all Bernie ever did was supply a bit of contractual stability to a previously disorderly field. Max added necessary barrister clauses to secure monopoly and exclusives which he then sold to Bernie in a shady undervalued deal for 99 yrs at $300M when it was worth way more that that for one year.
Innovation over refinement is the prefered path to performance. -- Get rid of the dopey regs in F1

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

gcdugas wrote:
WhiteBlue wrote:This is funny. Those poor sods obviously did not have a fraction of the mental capacity required to work their way across 50 different internet fora daily and post the same pompous opinion everywhere. Instead they had to satisfy their little egos by creating the most successfull racing series on the planet.
Bernie and Max didn't "create" a thing. They just happened to be in the right place at the right time. It would have happened no matter who played their roles. This is just my opinion but all Bernie ever did was supply a bit of contractual stability to a previously disorderly field. Max added necessary barrister clauses to secure monopoly and exclusives which he then sold to Bernie in a shady undervalued deal for 99 yrs at $300M when it was worth way more that that for one year.
So what is your definition of F1 then?

User avatar
gcdugas
3
Joined: 19 Sep 2006, 21:48

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

autogyro wrote:So what is your definition of F1 then?
Well in the context of the last few posts on this thread it is sufficient to say that F1 pre-dated Max and Bernie by decades.

As to what my "current definition" of F1 is it would be a "very open formula that requires bona-fide constructors, stands in the lineage of GP racing as it has been known for 60+ years, has the quickest lap time of all open wheel formulas and is the place where most technical innovations appear... etc." It certainly is NOT a highly restricted formula that spec's 99% of regulation for the cars even though that is what masquerades as GP racing for the last decade. (definitely since 2002 when V12s were outlawed) Maybe the end of the true spirit of F1 was 1998 with the forced introduction of narrow cars, grooved tires etc. Finding an exact historical point "where it all went wrong" is debatable but there is no doubt that today's F1 is a far cry from the true spirit of F1. Frozen engines, spec'd engine mass, CG height, bore centers, bore stroke ratios, alloys, cam shaft centers, std. ECU, spec tire... all these things are anathema to the true spirit of F1 and we all know it. Let's not pretend otherwise. Puhleeeze!
Innovation over refinement is the prefered path to performance. -- Get rid of the dopey regs in F1

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Toyota withdraws from Formula One

Post

Toyota's departure just goes to show just how out of touch with reality some of the teams and specifically their bosses are with the true "situation on the ground" as it pertains to the economy and its affect on their parent companies.

John Howwett was amongst the foolish contingent of FOTA that fought vigouresly agaisnt the budget cap claiming they would have to cut too many jobs too quickly and now his team is reportedly being forced to cut over 500 jobs.

And now we have the consumate embecile Montezemilo claiming that that global recession has nothing to do with Toyota's pull out, but it has to do with a now gone Max and his confrontation with FOTA which they obviously won.

http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/n ... 1040.shtml
Ecclestone told the Daily Express: "The problem is that their team manager John Howett fought against drastic cost-cutting all the way and was against new teams coming in."

The FIA is frustrated that the Formula One Teams Association (FOTA) members promised to commit to F1 in exchange for the scrapping of proposed radical budget cap rules, only for Toyota to breach that commitment weeks later.

"The FIA accepted the cost-reduction measures put forward by the teams on the basis that they would ensure a long-term commitment to the championship," the sport's governing body indicated.
Howett is clearly an asshole and hopefully will be out on his ass like the other 500+ toyota F1 employees