With the current rules you have the limit on weight ,so instead of placing ballastxpensive wrote:I think what you want from the F1 engine is compactness, minimum weight is limited, which would be very difficult to achieve with the surface-area needed from the cooling-fins.
My previous post above was an attempt to xplain why liquid cooling gives you an advantage in that respect.
with the motor you could also have caooling fins .
The compactness is also not really a valid point as the engines are really dwarfed in the current engine compartments -so there is enough room for some cooling ribs and fins and ducting ,you could even delete some of the cover in favour of licked surface I think. What has to be a concern is the engine length ,as the caylinder spacing may be a problem ,that is a valid point in my view .But is it really a do or die decision to have 20mm extra engine length ? I see wheelbase difference of more than this for winning cars so I at least doubt this to be a real issue.