I would imagine it will at least have it's share of red, white and blue, no? Personally, I'm kinda glad to hear they aren't going to have stars and stripes all over it. I get sick of seeing it overused here in the states sometimes.Fil wrote: I am a little disappointed that they won't be doing the cliché stars & stripes livery though.
The deal with MrM was probably just to look serious enough to keep "manufacturish" prospects like Prodrive and Lola out of contention for the selection bid last summer, while the agreement with MrT is perhaps to keep up appearances long enough to hold off Stefan/Toyota?WilliamsF1 wrote:Looks like Max was not the only bad seed in world of racing.Falcon was nothing more than a ploy to keep Roger Penske from building his own car as he did in CART for many years. The theory has it that when the IRL announced they would allow three chassis manufacturers for the next generation car – Roger Penske submitted a bid to be one of the three manufacturers, assuming of course that he would provide equal chassis to some of his competitors.
Floor of the car need not be a single piece. Floor also is not a stressed member so it does not matter if the autoclave is small or large.xpensive wrote: But recycling old images of generic-looking F1 cars without front-suspension, CFD results which could have been taken from "My F1 car" on F1T and a workshop without an autoclave big enough for an undertray, that can't go on for much longer.
I think the USF1-engineer interviewed is referring to the invisible front suspension in the image below, which gives a whole new meaning to the concept of "open wheel racing", doesn't it?raceman wrote:US F1 will have inventive cars
let's hope they are true, it will spice up the sport
what do ya think??
The same air of transparency is surrounding the engine. This car is supposed to be so fast that no one ever is expected to be capable of running into the back of it. That's why rear crash structure is simply not necessary. Either that or both cars will be driven by Chuck Norris.xpensive wrote:I think the engineer is referring to the invisible front suspension in the image below, which gives a whole new meaning to the concept of "open wheel racing", doesn't it?raceman wrote:US F1 will have inventive cars
let's hope they are true, it will spice up the sport
what do ya think??
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/imag ... USF1a1.jpg
True, but if I believe that I see a dark-blue conventional coil-spring as well in that image, am I completely out at sea?scarbs wrote:yes, all teams use vertical dampers, with the torsion bars effectively horizontal, and running longitudenal to the car. I dont see USF1 doing anything conceptually different here.
It could be, the pictures not clear enough (I cant see it myself), there's no performance difference between the two spring formats, coils just take up more space and need bigger holes in the monocoque to remove.xpensive wrote:True, but if I believe that I see a dark-blue conventional coil-spring as well in that image, am I completely out at sea?scarbs wrote:yes, all teams use vertical dampers, with the torsion bars effectively horizontal, and running longitudenal to the car. I dont see USF1 doing anything conceptually different here.