Scarbs, in your opinion -- is it that much shorter than Ferrari and McLaren as it seems? If so, how they managed to package everything?scarbs wrote:Ive seen the high res of this photo, the exhaust in on the flat upper surface of the sidepod. approximaitely below the B on RBS
I'm going to reserve judgement but I will say it does sound like a crossplane engine to me.mike wrote:running a cross plane?
since revs are limited at 18,000 and new rules require efficiency rather than raw power..
since the piston weight is low and rod is short and there is a limit on how low the engine can be, it could rev 20k at '06, a smooth 17,000 are likely
that could also explain the lack or rear wing support
True. + the obvious "reliability tweaks" thrown in for good measure.ISLAMATRON wrote:it is the same engine block that was homologated in 2006
and whatever other tweaks they wanted as they are allowed to change whatever they want until it is re-homologated after the first race I believe.jac wrote:True. + the obvious "reliability tweaks" thrown in for good measure.ISLAMATRON wrote:it is the same engine block that was homologated in 2006
Wrong again, as usual Wesley , they cannot change whatever they want, only the things which the teams were allowed to change from 2006 until today... and they can not "develop" it past when it is re-homologated after(or maybe just before) Bahrain GP.wesley123 wrote:they could change everything they want, the FIA wants back to teams using cheap cosworths, so cosworth can easily 'promote' their engine by develop it much more then the other teams can do.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossplanedjones wrote:Could somebody please explain to an idiot what a crossplane engine is and what the advantages of this would be?