the topic has been disscused before here:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4147&hilit=wheelbase
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4526&hilit=wheelbase
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4044&hilit=wheelbase
It has also been disscused in a 2008 thread if Ferrari could have made 2 versions of the car, with longer and shorter wheelbase. Of course that would be expensive and almost useless without changing all the aero...
The long "fast & stable" vs. short "good in twisty" characteristics of F1 wheelbases are only and no more than a myth.
A better design than rivals given a specific set of rules is a conjunction that includes not only wheelbase but entire suspension geometry, aero map and its sensibility and masses distribution and posibilities of relocations.
Im not an aero guy but I guess sidepods works closely with rear wheels and then also front wing and nosecone works closely with sidepods... placing the rear wheel position in relation to front wheel
can be a matter of aerodynamics and
then suspension geometry gets secondary... unless the position of rear pickups for wishbones turns problematic...
after all its all about the whole package
"You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." -Juan Manuel Fangio
"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence." -Ayrton Senna