I wrote that cute little irony, one in a long line, on February 4th, 2009, thread lasted almost a year. Cheers.xpensive wrote:Surely this is as serious as when Dan Gurney and Phil Hill vowed to enter F1 with their own team a couple of years ago.
I wrote that cute little irony, one in a long line, on February 4th, 2009, thread lasted almost a year. Cheers.xpensive wrote:Surely this is as serious as when Dan Gurney and Phil Hill vowed to enter F1 with their own team a couple of years ago.
No WB, he's most definetly not, as little as he was 20 years ago;WhiteBlue wrote: ...
Anderson is just not capable to run an F1 project:
...
I trust AMuS's Michael Schmidt in many issues but I don't think he knows much about engineering project management. If I were in a situation like Ken Anderson I would have hired a European project manager specialist to compliment my own capabilities in the field. Ken knew nothing about typical time lines of recent F1 projects with similar short execution time. My assumption from February last year when USF1 came out was that they were to hire such a person. Sauber and BMW certainly did that. You don't allways have to have it all in yourself, but you need to know your limitations and find the resources to compensate. This is what I meant when I said Ken could do it. With the proper help of course.xpensive wrote:No WB, he's most definetly not, as little as he was 20 years ago;WhiteBlue wrote: Some of the more spectacular claims by our honorable members here make no sense at all.
Anderson is just not capable to run an F1 project:
...
Ex-Formel 1-Pilot Stefan Johansson, ein Kenner der US-Rennszene, hatte mir schon im August letzten Jahres erzählt: “Vergiss den Anderson. Der ist ein Traumtänzer. Redet viel, nichts dahinter. Nur leider merken das viele Leute zu spät.” Man hätte auf den Schweden hören sollen.
I trust Auto Motor und Sport and Stefan Johansson, who was actually there when he tried it 20 years ago!
If you sell a business (entry) doesn't the buyer assume all aspects of the business including it's liabilities. Remember they cannot sell the entry it belongs to the FIA but they can sell the business that currently holds the entry meaning they would assume it's debts. Not a win for Stefanbill shoe wrote:In a rational world USF1 would sell the entry to Stefan. USF1 has refused to sell. My initial assumption was that USF1 had bad negotiating skills, was irrational, or was just plain spiteful.
However, there is a scenario where not selling the entry makes a kind of financial sense to USF1. Assume Stefan has offered $5 million for the USF1 entry. Next assume USF1 has net outstanding liabilities of $10 million (due to money contractually owed to Cosworth, to their landlord, to pay drivers as refunds, etc.). Therefore, if Andersen-Hurley sell the entry to Stefan then the USF1 business corporation will still have a net liability and the team owners will receive no personal profit from the entry sale. They only have a personal financial incentive to sell the entry if the Stefan offer is higher than all the accumulated USF1 obligations. Those obligations are pretty big right now...
I'm not a bankruptcy expert, but I know US law is weaker than English law regarding the responsibilities of managers of failing firms to act in a way that minimizes loss and harm.
And I'm assuming Andersen is familiar with US bankruptcy law.
Anderson has insisted that the Charlotte-based operation remains hopeful of making it onto the grid in 2011.
He is adamant that the team has not closed down, and says it now awaiting news from the FIA about if it can defer its entry from the start of this season until the beginning of 2011.