Are the inerter and j-damper the same thing? That car was the blitzer it was because of the inerter.dren wrote:Was that the J-damper's first year?segedunum wrote:Ahhhh, the McLaren where Tombazis started in 2004, bolted one of his front-ends on to Newey's car and it rocketed off into the distance. At Barcelona Raikkonen made his first pit stop, came out and was still in the lead.WilliamsF1 wrote:
This is by far the fastest f1 car and with tyres that last the whole race.
A point well made about this car is that it did what it was doing on one set of tyres through the whole race. I can remember Pat Symonds visibly confused about this car and trying to work out why it was at least eight tenths of a second per lap faster.
Thanks, and yeah the interter is what I was thinking the J-damper was with the flywheel absorbing the energy, sort of like a mechanical capacitor.deus1066 wrote:A J damper is a damper that works on "jounce" (basically when both wheels move together), an inerter is a type of J damper which contains a flywheel to alter its properties and adapt to a given situation... or at least thats my understanding of it.
There is an excellent article here:
http://www.f1technical.net/features/10586
And yes, the inerter was first introduced on this car, I think at Imola.
deus1066 wrote:A J damper is a damper that works on "jounce" (basically when both wheels move together), an inerter is a type of J damper which contains a flywheel to alter its properties and adapt to a given situation... or at least thats my understanding of it.
Avus? You could as well bring up drag racing.therealjackson wrote:If refering to top speed as being the fastest then the auto union steamline cars of the late 30s, while not stricly f1 cars, would eclipse any of the current cars top speed in race trim. At AVUS in 1937 they averaging 275km/h over a lap and toutching 400km/h in a straight line, making them a good 50km/h faster than in 2004.
Yep, the F2004 had 14 fastest laps to Mclaren's 4 that year. I reckon that's the fastest car.Pandamasque wrote:Avus? You could as well bring up drag racing.therealjackson wrote:If refering to top speed as being the fastest then the auto union steamline cars of the late 30s, while not stricly f1 cars, would eclipse any of the current cars top speed in race trim. At AVUS in 1937 they averaging 275km/h over a lap and toutching 400km/h in a straight line, making them a good 50km/h faster than in 2004.
Auto Union is good and ima let u finish but still F2004 was the fastest F1 car of all time.
OF ALL TIME!
If it's not the fastest, it's one of the best looking cars - pure evilGiblet wrote:
Are the inerter and j-damper the same thing? That car was the blitzer it was because of the inerter.
Agreed! Any driver will look like a devil with those horns =D>Shaddock wrote:If it's not the fastest, it's one of the best looking cars - pure evil
Pandamasque wrote:Agreed! Any driver will look like a devil with those horns =D>Shaddock wrote:If it's not the fastest, it's one of the best looking cars - pure evil
I don't understand how the 'plain' cars of today ('09 onwards) can actually have more downforce than these era cars back then with all this nonsense bolted onto itcravenciak wrote:Pandamasque wrote:Agreed! Any driver will look like a devil with those horns =D>Shaddock wrote:If it's not the fastest, it's one of the best looking cars - pure evil