Renault R30

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
newbie
newbie
0
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 23:33

Re: Renault R30

Post

if you follow the general development of the R30 its pretty clear that renault simply dont have the budget and resources for developing the F-duct. massive potential in such a device.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Renault R30

Post

The R30 is now the "best of the rest" in the standings, with Renault joint 4th with RBR-Renault at 18 points, and the first non-"big 4" team to overtake a "big 4" team in the standings :mrgreen: That's where the RB6's reliability has got them.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: Renault R30

Post

In race conditions, the Renault can beat the Mercedes.

Image

the holes :shock: and the nose a la R29 :shock:

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Renault R30

Post

Blackout wrote:Image
Look at the DDD holes!

newbie
newbie
0
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 23:33

Re: Renault R30

Post

those 'louvres' are exactly what Ferrari want to introduce with their diffuser upgrade. the MP4-25 also has these

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Renault R30

Post

How are those holes legal?
Looks almost like a triple decker. I need to see it from more angles.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

tommylommykins
tommylommykins
-1
Joined: 12 May 2009, 22:14

Re: Renault R30

Post

To help in providing proof that the current Renault does not have a McLaren duct, take a look at the sharkfin. It is not connected to the rear wing. Currently, every implementation of such a system has a duct inside the connecting part of the sharkfin.

Unless Renault have devised a teleportation system to move the air from the nose to the wing, I think it is safe to assume Renault do not have this.

Francesc
Francesc
49
Joined: 20 Jun 2009, 21:44

Re: Renault R30

Post


timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Renault R30

Post

Great thanks! =D>

imightbewrong
imightbewrong
17
Joined: 07 Aug 2008, 16:18

Re: Renault R30

Post

Awesome, thanks!

Okay, how is this legal? Please explain to me how it fits within the rules, I for sure can't..

nacho
nacho
6
Joined: 04 Sep 2009, 08:38

Re: Renault R30

Post

I think when viewed from a perpendicular view the gaps will close up.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Renault R30

Post

nacho wrote:I think when viewed from a perpendicular view the gaps will close up.
Or maybe when viewed from below there's no bodywork above.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Renault R30

Post

this must be the best DDD underfloor picture ever..wow..

sh^rkbo0ts
sh^rkbo0ts
0
Joined: 25 Feb 2007, 22:01

Re: Renault R30

Post

Wow. Rules really are made to be broken.

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Re: Renault R30

Post

Flat floor below bodywork rule stands only for area between wheels (wheels, not axles). For that same reason nose has no flat floor below itself.

Image