2011 Ferrari - Alonso, and?

[donskar]

Massa imo.

Ferarri will farm out Bianchi to one of their engine satilite teams for a couple of years free of charge, Ferarri pay the wages, Sauber will probably get a young driver.

If the silly season is already starting, it is really silly.

I have a feeling that 2011 is gonna be pretty much status quo over the end of 2010 season line up. Of whitch i can see 3 driver changes before the end of the year tho.

A mature response to a silly thread
=D>
+1

[mx_tifoso]

Massa 'for sure'. He's been groomed to be in a Ferrari for almost a decade now and I can't seem him in another team, unless he personally wants to defect like the german traitor.

[Mr Alcatraz]

I want to preface this reply by saying it's way too early to be having this discussion.
I think it is Massa's seat to lose! However, I'll support anyone Ferrari trot out there.
I think Bulk will struggle a little more in the early going, and suddenly come to grips with the car.
He did something similar when Kimi came over.

[seinfeld]

Alonso is such a team slut he has been to nearly all the teams.

Alonso is the F1 Bike, Everyone has had a ride

[ESPImperium]

Massa imo.

Ferarri will farm out Bianchi to one of their engine satilite teams for a couple of years free of charge, Ferarri pay the wages, Sauber will probably get a young driver.

If the silly season is already starting, it is really silly.

I have a feeling that 2011 is gonna be pretty much status quo over the end of 2010 season line up. Of whitch i can see 3 driver changes before the end of the year tho.

A mature response to a silly thread
=D>
+1 :lol:

Out of my usual character for me.

[Mr Alcatraz]

Alonso is such a team slut he has been to nearly all the teams.

Alonso is the F1 Bike, Everyone has had a ride

Brilliant
Yea' it really has to suck to be leading the WDC For Ferrari.
I wonder which hot FEMALE Italian model he had to bone down on to get that gig.
They're is an Italian term that fits Fred a little more appropriately.
i bambini ripetono dopo me g-i-g-o-l-o

[Mr Alcatraz]

Massa will out-drive Alonso and retain his seat in the number 1 ferrari. Alonso will spit the dummy again and go to Renault. Lol

Dear friend, dont you think its quite early to say this..? [-X

I don't think it's too early for this tosser to demonstrate his lack of
actual knowledge or insight into or about F1 :-"

[beret]

@ above
You know, i dont like El Nano either..but after contemplated i concluded that he's even better than 41 yr old German.

[Mr Alcatraz]

@ above
You know, i dont like El Nano either..but after contemplated i concluded that he's even better than 41 yr old German.

And that has what to do with the question asked on this thread? Could you elaborate?

[beret]

k dude i conceded.

[Mr Alcatraz]

k dude i conceded.

I think I am the one that missed the meaning of your comment.
Peace my man

[ISLAMATRON]

Massa will out-drive Alonso and retain his seat in the number 1 ferrari. Alonso will spit the dummy again and go to Renault. Lol

exactly, and with Michilin possibly coming back it might be a good move for the chicken. Maybe the stay puff Michilen man can gift him another couple championships.

Dont think Ferrari would switch to Michilen.

Alonso is the definition of a paper champion.

2 races in a row F.Bulk has beat him to the finish line.... and counting.

I just hate the save gas bullshit they put on Felipe in Bahrain, but I dont expect better from Ferrari.

So it would probably be a trade for Kubica, which F.BULK would also go on to show as being way overrated.

[rjsa]

Brazilian TV repeated ad nauseum this week end that another 3 years contract for Massa is drafted already. THat is heir best interest that it happens, but they wouldn't be saying that if they didn't have a nice source.

[Mr Alcatraz]

I stand corrected. sorry bro

[mx_tifoso]

I stand corrected. sorry bro

I have deleted all the corresponding posts. They were off topic and based on erroneous quotations, which if were to have been on purpose would have required serious action. But it's clear that it was a mistake on Tazio's part, most likely due to the original three quote discussion from which it was extracted.