Interesting that slit in the sidepod flickup. Renault has a similar solution, but their version is a separate layer on top of the flick up, instead of a hole in it.
Not sure if this is for the purpose of giving downforce, whereas the Renault version is a plain and straight airfoil in a place where the turbulence won't affect the overall aerodynamics.
And when I look at that rear end I can't help but hink that someone ripped a page out of the Mclaren book. The airbox, the rear cut, the shelf wing, sidepods etc.
Right?
Not that copying Mclaren's aero would be a bad thing. After all, they only had the best aerodynamics last season.
I find the rearwing interesting. Only the upper element has a droop. That's a strange solution. Unless they wanted to keep the wing as high from the airbox as possible, and still have a high angle of attack in the middle section. The perfect compromise.
Not as strange as the renault solution, though.