http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/motorspor ... -22191711/
Anyone seen above? Something about using bees wax to control ride heigh...
I thought it was BS they used.jason.parker.86 wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/motorspor ... -22191711/
Anyone seen above? Something about using bees wax to control ride heigh...
Can you give sources for those figures or elaborate how you arrive at them? The only known way to get reliable data that I know of is sound analysis and comparison with the own engine's data.ESPImperium wrote: Mercedes FO108X = 765Bhp
Renault RS27-2010 = 755Bhp
Ferarri 065 = 750 Bhp
Cosworth CA2010 = 743bhp
Mercedes FO108X = 765Bhp
Renault RS27-2010 = 755Bhp
Ferarri 065 = 750 Bhp
Cosworth CA2010 = 743bhp
I did not notice much of a difference compared to other cars in the wet.raymondu999 wrote:Do you guys think the RB6 is especially sensitive to dirty air, or is it just a bad case of traffic? Vettel and Webber said that they had good pace in clear air, but behind others they were suffering. Or is it just a case of the quick German kid not being very good with overtaking?
Strange, it seemed to be the opposite last year.raymondu999 wrote:Do you guys think the RB6 is especially sensitive to dirty air, or is it just a bad case of traffic? Vettel and Webber said that they had good pace in clear air, but behind others they were suffering.
I doubt it. When you're behind other cars you want straight line speed and when you're out in front you want downforce. Maybe Renault will give them thirty odd horsepower to help?Or is it just a case of the quick German kid not being very good with overtaking?
Yer, it's pretty difficult to compare the car performance in uneven conditions and ask whether that will be repeated in coming races. Somehow, I doubt it. In Malaysia RB made the right tactical calls, especially in qualifying, and got the best possible result.autogyro wrote:The wet conditions tend to negate all the ride height and aero benefits and even the competition. IMO RB simply got the tactics of the race wrong and made the wrong calls.
Yeah, it's the old case of better overtaking vs better pace over a single lap isn't it? I think that would solve half the equation though. THe car is put up for a great laptime, but not for overtaking manoeuvres.segedunum wrote:I doubt it. When you're behind other cars you want straight line speed and when you're out in front you want downforce. Maybe Renault will give them thirty odd horsepower to help?