multisync wrote: . . . lack of funding and probably the lowest wages in F1 are equally compelling...
I spoke to one employee and the feeling there is not one of joyous celebration over their defection at this stage of the season..
I'll start by saying I worked as Sr VP of an Indian software company, and in that role engaged in some high-level negotiations to sell our company to
other Indian high-tech companies. All that by way of saying this is not some emotional, prejudiced outburst -- I have some experience with Indian businessmen and business practices.
Judging FIF1 against my experience, I expected them to be a shoestring operation, paying lowest possible wages, paying bills late, being litigious, having a high turnover rate among their highest ranking personnel. All of which has happened to one degree or another. That's not necessarily all negative, some of that is a form of good business practices. It's just that Indian companies that I worked with always seemed to go just one step too far in their negotiations, salary structure, personnel policies, etc. We non-Indians used this analogy: if an Indian company contracted to pay another company $1,000 for 1,000 items, and only 999 were delivered, they would not pay $999 -- they would pay nothing at all and keep the 999 items, because the contract was not fulfilled.
BTW, I don't see Willis going to FI -- I think he'd want autonomy and a good salary -- both are very hard to get fom Indians.
Finally:
nothing in the above is meant as an attack. Sincere apologies if my early-morning semi-conscious state caused my tone to be other than what I meant. I'm just trying to provide some context to members of this forum who might have no experience with Indian business practices. If anything,
I hope they do well. F1 needs more diversity.
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill