http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/gM ... directlink
Note the rear wing endplate on the inboard side....you can see the "duct". I am assuming this is for the main flow part for the blown slot, but the actual switching portion is elsewhere?
gilgen wrote: There is no pollution of the thread, as the above responses seem to be an expansion of the Mercedes topic. Do you by any chance, work for Mercedes?
I DID! But I take it that the moderators were quite happy to leave the other posts equating Renault and Ferrari, to Mercedes, on the forum, as they were relevant.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:gilgen wrote: There is no pollution of the thread, as the above responses seem to be an expansion of the Mercedes topic. Do you by any chance, work for Mercedes?
Gilgen feel free to ignore all my posts.
Feel free also to add anything of substance about Mercedes GP, and quit trying to get a reaction, you wont find it here.
I have posted details about Merc not being able to dissipate heat into their tyres on low fuel and smooth tracks.[url=http://www.espn.co.uk/formula1/sport/story/28852.html]Nick Fry[/url] wrote:Red Bull and McLaren are fairly dominant, but Ferrari have had a mixed season. We've struggled to make the so-called f-duct rear wing work, and we don't have the special exhaust system Red Bull have. If we can get both of those things on the car then we'll be in a lot better position, and in the second half of the season we will continue to work hard and improve.
Not a very good analogy! The tyres for Le Mans are designed with harder compounds, so as to minimise tyre changes. F1 tyres are purposely far softer, as they only have to last an average of 150 miles, and they provide far more cornering grip. After all, my Jaguar is far heavier, and the tyres seem to last 15k miles.ggajic wrote:If Bridgestone will leave F1 at the end of year I don't think that Mercedes will invest much into further car development. But then again it is much up to suspension how car will handle tires. In my opinion Bridgestone has no intention to improve their tires either (since they are leaving). Quality of their rubber was always questionable. For the record, Audi on 2010 24h Le Mans (fastest in history) used one set of Michelin tires per 491km and clocked average speed of 226km/h. Just to mention that Le Mans prototypes are heavier then F1 cars..
They have lower power/weight ratio, so the stress on tyres on acceleration is slower.ggajic wrote:What about power output? LMP1 cars have 650hp engines, compared to F1`s 700-750hp. Also, compare Bridgestone vs. Michelin in 2005. Fact is simple - Bridgestone can`t produce long lasting high performance tires.
Totally agree with you. Ggajic actually defeats his own "argument" by pointing out the lower bhp, which reduces the loads on tyres.timbo wrote:They have lower power/weight ratio, so the stress on tyres on acceleration is slower.ggajic wrote:What about power output? LMP1 cars have 650hp engines, compared to F1`s 700-750hp. Also, compare Bridgestone vs. Michelin in 2005. Fact is simple - Bridgestone can`t produce long lasting high performance tires.
Also, unless you know figures for lateral g forces of LMP1 you have no way to know how much tyres are stressed in the corners.
2005 is also not true -- after all, it was Michelin who had to withdraw its cars from a race.