segedunum wrote:
They went through staff reductions after Honda pulled out and throughout 2009. That was nothing new. There was uncertainty about whether the team would exist in 2009, nevermind 2010, they became a winning team in 2009 and they were still worried about existing in 2010? Mercedes took them over and established their future, and yet they were still worried about 2010 to the extent that they fouled up their car?
I can't buy any of that as a viable set of excuses. As soon as they arrived in 2009 and started winning they would have been a hell of a lot more confident about their future than they were.
Segedunum,
I tire greatly of having to explain everything in minute detail. If you understand the timescale and the F1 car development gestation period why would you argue?
1)Honda started development of the 2009 car in 2007.
2)It had one of the longest development cycles ever and incorporated clever fron wing and diffuser arrangements.
3)Honda announced its withdrawal from the sport on december the 5 2008, with the 2009 car having been fully developed under Honda's 220 million dollar budget.
4)The actual Brackley base shed 120 jobs initially and all of their engine department was closed with 300 odd staff leaving there.
5)They recieved an engine that was far better than they had before, Rubens going as far as to say the difference was "night and day".
6)The installation of the engine did create problems and explains why they were so late to getting testing.
7)When the season got under way, EVERYONE could see the Brawn's were on a different planet.
This is critical that you understand segedunum.
This was
not because of what happened from December 2008 to March 2009. Its exactly
because of Honda's investment that Brawn had the car to go out and destroy the opposition with for the first half of 2009. If you argue this, then no sense will come of me trying to explain.
When further cuts to staff were made, the car's advantage disappeared and work on the 2010 car was started, albeit with a very limited amount of resource due to their financial constraints.
Again it is critical that you understand, that a team fighting for the championship in 2009,
with half the man power it had in 2008, cannot hope to get a car
as good in 2010.
9) Mercedes stepped in, with the 2010 car in FINAL stages of development, scale models had already 100's of hours of wind tunnel time, as per Brawn himself at Abu Dhabi.
10) The car was designed with an inherrant flaw based on some tyre specs that Brawns team got wrong(they admit that)Further to this the cars aero concept has failed to work.
11) So from November the 8th 2009 to February 2010 Mercedes could only take stock of what it had, with the time too far gone to make any meaningful impression of its 2010 car.
12)Mercedes are staying for 3 years, all speculation is from media contorting what CEO Zetsche said about success.
"To win is a condition. The best or nothing at all is what our forefathers wanted and this is what we strive for today. Mercedes GP is no different, to win immediately is expecting alot but our plan is for 3 years"
13)Homologation and testing restrictions
So to surmise then, Mercedes are in a position where it can only paper over certain cracks inherited by a team that where in a state of flux.
And to compare December 2008 to November 2009 is not fair at all. Mercedes did not recieve a peach of a car that was developed to within an inch of its life at a cost of a quar
ter of a billion dollars.
Maybe you think Brawn had that
250 million to develop on the W01?
Mercedes will come good, give them a chance and dont judge them on a car designed during a tumultuous period of time for the team on a budget that the new teams probably have.
Considering that, you have to say they actually did ok!
They may not be champions in their time in F1, which could be as short as 3 years.
But they will put up a better show of it in 2011. Of that I will put my house on