Try this evil one.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:What is Rapid Prototyping?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapid_Prototyping
Try this evil one.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:What is Rapid Prototyping?
It is something Pirelli got written in the book ...it seems . to adhere closely to the construction characteristic of this years tyres..compound wise its different .JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:So they are going on this years bridgestone data for next years car that will be Pirelli shod?
I suppose the W02 will retain the roll over "blade".
The tech regs for next year have still not been finalised. I believe that ACTIVE wing stallers may not be allowed, but PASSIVE ones would be permissible. I also posted a month ago, that there was an FIA technical document relating to the blade roll-over bar on the Mercs. The call was for a standardised roll-bar structure. So again, the rules have not been finalised, but will affect every team equally, just as the rules did for this year.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Yea thanks marcush
"fetching Alonso ferrari outfit" will only be worn should MGP fail to win a race next year.
And seriously, should Loic Bigois design a half decent aero concept, Mercedes should be in with a shout as the slate gets wiped clean for 2011.
No F duct
No Double duiffuser
No Bridgestones
Compulsory weight distribution.
Resource restriction.
Almost all these things are a big bonus to Mercedes.
My prediction for 2011 is the W02 will bear no resemblance AT ALL to the W01. If it does, I will wear the "fetching alonso suit" for every GP of the year!
Given his history at Prost and Williams, where Williams went backwards after they fired Terzi, how likely is that?JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:And seriously, should Loic Bigois design a half decent aero concept
The slate does not get wiped clean. Next year's car will still be an evolution of this one with the same set of basic technical regulations and others to be resolved, as Red Bull and other teams will do. Only if you've fouled up totally will you need a completely new car.Mercedes should be in with a shout as the slate gets wiped clean for 2011.
Their straight line speed is useless anyway, as evidenced by Schumacher not seeing Sutil as he went past. I fail to see how they'll get ahead of everyone else next year.No F duct
Red Bull was the best car without it in 2009.No Double duiffuser
Same for everyone.No Bridgestones
If indeed that happens, but it's the same for everyone and there loopholes you can drive a truck through. That was as desperate a move as I've seen from Brawn and I simply can't see it being workable.Compulsory weight distribution.
No matter how many times you repeat this JET the resource restriction is bollocks, and has been shown to be bollocks. Mercedes has no advantage there. There are loopholes you can drive motorhomes through.Resource restriction.
Why?Almost all these things are a big bonus to Mercedes.
Of course it won't because they're having to design another basic 2010 car again because they totally fouled it up.My prediction for 2011 is the W02 will bear no resemblance AT ALL to the W01. If it does, I will wear the "fetching alonso suit" for every GP of the year!
It would be easier to buy FI's technical team, but Lotus seem to be doing that anyway. If my car had been passed so easily through a corner like Sutil did to Schumacher with the same powerplant I would consider whether I should be designing buses as Terzi did.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:They need to do a Force India and go back to basics.
The buck stops with Bigois.....so that would be a no. If Brawn has any nouse whatsoever he will know the aerodynamics are shite and this is not a tyre or a weight distribution problem. When you see excuses like that you see a gaping hole in the side of the hull.I would assume the person who got the tyres figures wrong to no longer be gainfully employed by MGP. Its cost them dearly this year...
As we've discussed before JET, it's how far Mercedes are away from the front. They will soon concede fourth to Renault anyway on current form. BMW made exactly the same mistake of focusing on the next season when they should have paid attention to results in the season they were in that the suits were basing their decisions on. You can't ignore now.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:As for Mercedes GP being a mistake, I think that is far too early to conclude. They occupy 4th position in their first year, Ferrari had that position last year and how long and prestigious have they been in F1. Not forgetting their budget and manpower.
You're trying to poo, poo this but it is eminently sensible. We've been told confidently that the financial disaster in the car industry is over, but it isn't. There is still an oversupply of volume car production and manufacturers are going to share models, chassis and engines ever more. That's why you see Lada being displayed on the Renault cars as well as rebranding of engines as others have said. You're only going to see this happen more. I don't know why you're trying to ignore how this has happened in the past and is going on now.The Daimler/Reanult tie up was all about Mercedes finding a partner to reduce costs on their samller vehicles, in Return Renault/nissan got their hands on Mercedes engines. F1 was never discussed in the tie up, and bringing Nissan to the table in F1 would take alot more than a Parts sharing venture and a team bemoaning(wrongly IMO) their Renault powerplant.