Podiums and 4th for a team in its first year as Mercedes is not a "disaster" as you put it. And I keep saying it because, its true. 2/3rds the way through 2010 and Mercedes are in 4th, Renault are 23 points behind Mercedes with 6 races left.segedunum wrote:The situation is a diaster, with the best engine in the field no less.How many times are you going to repeat this as if it's the first time you've said it?
So its not as if Im talking out of turn is it? Yes Renault are faster currently, but they will need to outscore Mercedes a few times yet before roles are reversed.
Your view that seems to think Mercedes had this grand plan to run a winning team on the cheap is not one I share.segedunum wrote: You're trying to poo, poo this but it is eminently sensible.That's why you see Lada being displayed on the Renault cars as well as rebranding of engines as others have said.
As for Formula One, it is merely marketing and it will follow all of the cost cutting and consolidation that the brands are undergoing themselves with Formula One teams they can ill afford. This will happen regardless of whether Formula One was discussed or not. Mercedes seemed confident that they were going to run a winning own-brand team on the cheap. They were wrong. They need other partners and input from elsewhere to make it viable to the company - which is how Mercedes have said they will view that team.
I'll tell you why, There is no precedent for it. The BGP001 was the result of 400 millions worth of investment.
So to say they thought they would take it over to expect to win on the cheap is undermining the due diligence process of Mercedes itself.
Even an amatuer accountant know that the BGP001 had 3 times the budget and 2 the manpower that the W01 had, and you can see the results of that.
Mercedes are in F1 because it fits their portfolio, and the resource restriction enabled them to do so, because it meant IN FUTURE, they wouldnt need to spend 300million a year on F1. Haug has already said the team should be self sustaining by 2012, somthing that the new concorde agreement and resource restriction made possible.
The whole point was to make it attractive to manufacturers and Mercedes wanted in when All the rest went the other way.
Does this mean they should be lampooned for running an F1 team? [-X
Does it mean they are naive? Maybe.
But in all fairness, without Mercedes the team would be up faeces creek without a paddle, and for that alone they deserve credit.