http://www.autoevolution.com/news/merce ... 24379.html
The interesting thing is that both Petronas and Allianz were BMW's sponsers too
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52284/5228451c7fe646b73dab788f5f8ec9b900d31954" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
What happened in 2009, apart from the fact that they steadily squandered a winning position? Oh, and if you think they had no money it turns out they weren't quite the paupers they made out to be:On top of this you see no reason why the W01 should not be competitive this year, conveniently forgetting all of 2009.
Unfortunately, Eddie Jordan was the one person who said straight away that Schumacher would be returning and driving for Mercedes, and no one believed him - me included. He might look like an idiot sometimes but he has an excellent nose for these things.andrew wrote:Lets put the Schumacher re-retiring into perspective regarding in 2 words.
Eddie Jordan.
In the age of Enron, Madoff, and the Greek government covering up a deficit which was three times reported, anything is possible, xcept for Honda pissing away their GEUR investment to Mercedes and sending one year of financing to go with it.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote: ...
So not only do you detest the team, you now think Mercedes did a secret deal with Honda that escaped the labour unions, board and shareholders?
Finally Mercedes did a deal with Brawn, in essence buying the team twice.![]()
...
Mercedes would have had to explain where these hundreds of millions of euros where going after sacking 10 thousand staff. Do you seriously think a limited company would withold information to the stock exchange that would have had an influence on its share price? That is a prison sentence right there.
...
+1marcush. wrote: It does not look like Schumachers on track performance does any bad to them at this time...
No he's not, and neither are you, you are both gullible to the xtreme, I think.WhiteBlue wrote:JET is correct.
There is a logical fallacy for that that escapes me right now. Absense of proof either way does not mean that something didn't happen.WhiteBlue wrote:The fact that no such payment is recorded is positive proof that it never existed. Honda simply got none of the m92.5 pounds back.
I agree with you. TRhere is such a thing as creatie accounting, and large sums can be disguised under arious headings, such as marketing, advertising, etc. The real winner in all this is Brawn himself. Does he deserve it, maybe or maybe not. I hope that he looked after all the staff that were sacked.segedunum wrote:Fourth best team? After over a decade and countless billions? I'm not sure what kind of statement that is supposed to be making. That's why Honda and Toyota pulled out.
There is a logical fallacy for that that escapes me right now. Absense of proof either way does not mean that something didn't happen.WhiteBlue wrote:The fact that no such payment is recorded is positive proof that it never existed. Honda simply got none of the m92.5 pounds back.
Logic then tells us that Honda are not going to spend 100 million keeping a team they don't want any more going in order for them to turn into Mercedes's factory team. Toyota chose to mothball theirs. Where's the weight of argument there?