sounds like north Korean english to me...djos wrote:LOL, it's phonic english for "Exactly".forty-two wrote:
Sorry if I'm being slow here Lotus7, but who is Ed Zachery?
So the telemetry does suggest that he wanted to continue. I saw him turn the steering wheel to go back into the track, and i saw the left wheel brake then started to rotate, suggesting mark released the brake; meaning it was not slipping. Mark wanted to come back into the track to either continue or hit something.After Mark’s impact with the wall, it was clear on the TV and from the data that his car was badly damaged.
“However, the natural and immediate instinct of any competitive driver is not to give up and to keep going.
“In the atrocious conditions, Mark made the snap decision to continue as every driver would in that situation – it’s absurd to suggest that Mark would ever deliberately take out another driver.
I fully agree. There seem to be a lot of "experts" who know how to control a car after a crash. But until they have been put in the same position as Mark, how on earth can they know what he was trying to do?Terrible3 wrote:Wow I cant believe we are still talking about Marks crash. It was wet and slippery and Mark was simply caught out. The back end stepped out the car backed its way into the wall. The car just happened to then come back across the track and take out NR. After hitting the wall the car had been damaged to the point where Mark was simply a passenger. The result was simply a racing incident as a result of non ideal conditions. No further inquiry is needed, nor do I see NR asking for any investigations.
We may not know how, we may not know when, but he'll do it again!Webber was a fool not to use his brakes. He will make the same mistake again, but this time with another driver.
But we know this much. For all of you that still misses the previous one, F1T has found itself a new troll; meet ringo.ringo wrote:After surviving that crash in Valencia, Mark knows first hand how sturdy his cockpit is. He'll take a whack for the championship.
As i said in previous threads, this isn't the last we've seen of webber crashing into someone.
repeat quoute.We may not know how, we may not know when, but he'll do it again!Webber was a fool not to use his brakes. He will make the same mistake again, but this time with another driver.
Nah, Ringo is harmless compared to previous. He's ok, and there will always be an argument for that case, I think it is idiotic, though I am Australian.xpensive wrote:But we know this much. For all of you that still misses the previous one, F1T has found itself a new troll; meet ringo.