http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/87984
what bridgestone should have done !!
let's hope the teams agree
It is rather unfortunate that many "fans" cannot separate race performance and requirements from that of road cars.lebesset wrote:...
but unfortunately it is a big deal for a tyre manufacturer , the vast majority of people who watch F1 have no idea of the finer points , so making tyres that get comments like ...they don't last well .....would be a very brave step for pirelli
...
I do NOT want to see more of James Allen live. He does very well on those techinical reportages though. I would like to see more of those as well.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:I think their approach needs less Eddie Jordan and more James Allen.
I like the fact that Eddie Jordan just pulls everyone over and is generally stupid. It gives us all something (or someone) to laugh at. James Allen was always too serious and shouty. He seems very good, just not live. I like his videos and what he writes about the technical part of F1 a lot more. But I don't think I would want Eddie 'The Clown' Jordan to be replaced, he is hilarious!JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Lolzi
James Allen will give you more technical insight in 2 mins than Eddie Jordan would in a lifetime. He is worth 100 Jordans, and my Plasma will last longer not having to strain by forcing 20 million colours representing Jordans stupendously ill judged attire.
I think this is also a good point. These Bridgestone tires have had years of development and teams understand the tires very well and are able to make them work over long stints.DaveW wrote:It would appear that some F1 teams achieve "balanced" tyre use rather more frequently than others.