I was thinking the same thing. Make the thickness less, or try and make the tyre in such a way that the hard tyres have more contact patch than the softs, whitch are more knife-edgey with more the grip in the centre of the tyre.lebesset wrote:no reason for tyres to have softer compounds ...just give them less rubber
Im thinking something like the Michelen tyre that was developed for MotoGP where the centre was soft and the outer section was harder.
Can be done, but would mean a completly diffrent driving style for the drivers, not to mention how little grip they would have in the mid corner, more mistakes??? Mistakes making better racing, now that is a intresting concept.
But i was thinking about the concervitive theory, and came to this conclusion:
If tyres were to have a guideline for how long they should have, and if tyres were limited to each car each weekend (exept wets and inters) could this be adopted:
Super Soft: 12-18 Laps (+/- 2 Laps)
Soft: 15-22 Laps (+/- 3 Laps)
Medium: 19-27 Laps (+/- 4 Laps)
Hard: 25-32 Laps (+/- 5 Laps)
Each race weekend each car had 4 Options and 3 Primes allocated to it. Thats 7 sets of tyres for the weekend, meaning that the drivers that looked after their tyres in FP1 & 2 would see more options for the race. As for the teams that have their cars is Q1, they should have access to a single set of "super" hard tyres for the race, so they can at least go the whole race without stopping, give them a edge there, with the guys in Q3 having to start on the tyres they set their fastest lap on the set they start on.
As for wets id like to see 4 sets of wets and inters per car, with one set of either not allowed to be used for anything but the race.
Id be quite happy with a conservitive approach to tyres, but the ammount of tyres per car reduced to the levels above. Also creating a more random race patern, make the guys want to overtake as 17 of them will have to stop, meaning an emphisis on strategy that way.