![Image](http://photos.gpupdate.net/large/167618.jpg)
![Image](http://i67.servimg.com/u/f67/12/07/06/50/ailero10.jpg)
Interesting.
Where were these taken and when?Carlo's wrote: Interesting.
Does anyone know, in general, what percentage of rear downforce is created by the rear wing vs. the ground effect? The diffuser always has more potential it seems, than a wing, but with the rules on undertray/diffuser being so restrictive I'm not sure if this is true anymore.forty-two wrote:I hadn't thought of that.
Surely running all the time without a RW would hurt like mad in the twisty stuff?
I was wondering this, too. Won't they just be banging off the limiter when the wing is cut to passing mode? Will the teams really want to gear their cars taller and end up spending most of there time on the straights in a 7th that's too tall?Arunas wrote:One consider gearbox - is it enough only longer 7th gear to cover increase in top speed? Another thing, how much DF is lost without rear flap 1/2 of RW total (anyone with aero experience to know)? It can make aero balance totaly out of shape, as very long FW lever can reduce rear DF even more.
Thoughts?
I think I saw some estimations on this forum a while ago, but I'm not too sure where exactly... Maybe it was in BGP 001 thread?Formula None wrote:Does anyone know, in general, what percentage of rear downforce is created by the rear wing vs. the ground effect?
Thats the virgin front wing.madly wrote: This one is my favourite
![]()