Did you not read CHT's post?lolzi wrote:Doesn't that just show that McLaren Racing or whatever they're called will not be affected by McLaren Automotive?
In no way impliesMclaren is also seeking to raise GBP340m from private investors for 49% stake in the company to fund the automotive project.
Which also mean that the Mclaren Group will have to contribute the other 51% worth of resources and IP to fund this project.
Perhaps the movable wing discussion should be in a thread of it's own, but while it's still here...nacho wrote:Wouldn't the movable wing make it highly diffucult to runaway, even a slower car could hang behind a faster car with it? Or 2 or more cars could work together passing each other and a poor guy ahead of the road would be quickly caught.
My question was meant as a question, not like a childish insult. English is not my native language nor do I have any education in finance, so I didn't understand his post. I thought if I asked, I might get an answer in a language I could understand, but I was obviously wrong.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Did you not read CHT's post?lolzi wrote:Doesn't that just show that McLaren Racing or whatever they're called will not be affected by McLaren Automotive?
the RBR7 is going to be a tight as* machineMandrake wrote:I wonder, is it forbidden to route the exhaust into the diffusor directly? F1 cars of old days had their exhaust placed in there as well, giving great fireworks under braking and downshifting.gridwalker wrote:I guess they will have to simply blow over the diffuser, rather than through the slots that were created using the "hole that is not a hole" loophole that is being closed to ban the DDD.
Unless someone gets creative with their exhaust venting, it is doubtful we will see anything near the complexity of the 2010 EBD.
From what I've read so far, the problem always was the changing DF-levels with changing engine load. This season, teams have overcome this with the retarded ignition, does that mean we could see the return of direct diffusor-feeding exhausts?
Because pullrods are so revolutionary and magical...earlrue wrote:the RBR7 is going to be a tight as* machineMandrake wrote:I wonder, is it forbidden to route the exhaust into the diffusor directly? F1 cars of old days had their exhaust placed in there as well, giving great fireworks under braking and downshifting.gridwalker wrote:I guess they will have to simply blow over the diffuser, rather than through the slots that were created using the "hole that is not a hole" loophole that is being closed to ban the DDD.
Unless someone gets creative with their exhaust venting, it is doubtful we will see anything near the complexity of the 2010 EBD.
From what I've read so far, the problem always was the changing DF-levels with changing engine load. This season, teams have overcome this with the retarded ignition, does that mean we could see the return of direct diffusor-feeding exhausts?
Adrian will do the magic again, I'm sure
it's all there - pullrod susp, RBR gearbox, top notch EBD and some smart engine mappers etc...
Well, not compared to "engine mappers" at least will these guys be onboard? Maybe RB7 will be (as far as I know) the world's first F1 3-seater!Jersey Tom wrote:Because pullrods are so revolutionary and magical...