How?Izzy410 wrote:and the size of the wheel is 26.5 mm in radius and 16 mm wide. if the tyre flex with a thin wall the increase surface area touching the track can increase drag.
How?Izzy410 wrote:and the size of the wheel is 26.5 mm in radius and 16 mm wide. if the tyre flex with a thin wall the increase surface area touching the track can increase drag.
okay imagine a stiff tyre that doesnt flex the contact point would be like thisJersey Tom wrote:How?Izzy410 wrote:and the size of the wheel is 26.5 mm in radius and 16 mm wide. if the tyre flex with a thin wall the increase surface area touching the track can increase drag.
what you say does have some logic in it but not only in drag reduction but i think in power gained.pudin wrote:I wonder if there are any ways to actually remove the vacuum at the entrance of the co2 canister.(i dunno the perfect word for the part.)
That will reduce drag i guess,but quite hard to be done.
Except rolling wheels are in contact with static friction, not kinetic.Izzy410 wrote:okay imagine a stiff tyre that doesnt flex the contact point would be like thisJersey Tom wrote:How?Izzy410 wrote:and the size of the wheel is 26.5 mm in radius and 16 mm wide. if the tyre flex with a thin wall the increase surface area touching the track can increase drag.
Red dot is the point of contact (friction area)
but if the tyre flex, the contact are increase, hence the red dot area is increased and more friction.
in simple term, just take a cirlce and roll it. its easier than taking an oval and rolling on its long side
so it still makes a difference doesnt it? if the tyre flex the contact is bigger so to overcome static friction it takes more energy and to overcome the following kinetic friction it also takes more energy.Jersey Tom wrote:
Except rolling wheels are in contact with static friction, not kinetic.
we have machines you cant imagine of haha there's a manufacturing centre that we use that has facilities for almost anything you can imagine to cut.pudin wrote:That small holes quite hard to be done in the machine isnt it?
or you have other ways to manufacture it?
And you using a 3 axis cutter or a 5 axis cutter?
If 3,you will have trouble cutting the middle part of your car
Unless you use 2 separate balsa and glue it together
Completely different concept. Tires generate 'drag' through energy loss in hysteretic materials. Not friction. Not a surface thing.Izzy410 wrote:so it still makes a difference doesnt it? if the tyre flex the contact is bigger so to overcome static friction it takes more energy and to overcome the following kinetic friction it also takes more energy.Jersey Tom wrote:
Except rolling wheels are in contact with static friction, not kinetic.
Same concept of rubber tyre that is fully inflated and that of partially inflated. the surface area increases therefore more friction regardless of static or kinetic
understood completely. will do in the next few posts.pudin wrote:Gluing is the best choice but remember the car must be made from 1 balsa block.
BTW nice render.
And,you could try close the hole where the tyre placed,i really dunno how to say this part either.
Because the air at the middle part will be sucked by the vacuum produce from the gaps between your tyres if you didnt close it.
Do you understand ?
I can post a picture if you want to.
Could you post your latest car Izzy?
And the readings too
Soooooo. im not so sure on the hysteretic materials part but from my search it indicates some sort of material memory? care to explain.Jersey Tom wrote:
Completely different concept. Tires generate 'drag' through energy loss in hysteretic materials. Not friction. Not a surface thing.