iceracer wrote:I think there are significant advantage in dual plug performance!
as said early in tread old pkw alfa 164 has dual plugs and later Alfa 156!..
i remebrer late in 1980 something ,Alfa/fiat group made a commercial thing about the benefit of dual plugs!
they put Swedish/ World Rally star Björn Waldegård, or was it Stig blomquist to drive the Alfa 164 DP from stockholm to Milano with on a fuelsaving trip!
remeber Alfa 164 is a BIG car !..
result of milage was 0.39L/10km !,,, very, very good campare to those days for ex volvo 740 (b230) engines that could not run better then 0,9L /10Km
AND COUNTERWISE YOU SHOULD HAVE SIGNIFICANT hp GAIN ON SAME AMOUNT OF FUEL WHEN USING dp ENGINES!.._AND THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE F1 CARS ,, FOR PERFORMANCE REASON!..I CANT really FIGURE OUT WHY DUAL PLUGS ARE NOT ALOWED!..
But i guess if development of this kind of engine did go right, mileage should have dropped! way below 0.3L/10Km 20 years later AND THAT DONT LIKE FUEL/GAS COMPANYS AROUND THE WORLD!,,and thats the real reason we dont have this kind of engines on every car..
Duel plugs, other than avoiding failure through redundancy, are at best a band aid. A proper head/piston design greatly enhances flame travel through squish, swirl and tumble. These convection mechanisms augment flame travel by double digit factors.
Alfa is a poor source for supporting duel ignition. They were wedded to the hemi combustion chamber which has poor squish and intake charge characteristics. Similarly, hemi combustion chambers were common in aircraft engines, though they needed redundant ignition by regulation.