No KERS hence no extra cooling?myurr wrote:That side comparison is really interesting. The Lotus's side pods look less bulky than the Ferrari, particularly width ways, but the rear of the Ferrari with their trick suspension actually looks lower. [/armchairanalysis]
Hardly.manchild wrote:I've put question-mark behind supercavitation, suggesting that the idea of front blown exhaust perhaps might be based on benefits of principle of supercavitation or something similar.
If you look closely at this image it says RB5 on the edge of the crash-structure, coincidence?nacho wrote:Adam Cooper says it's a 2009 Red Bull gearbox.
Nicely summed, bt not only this, cavitation is a phenomena that occurs in liquid medium, not in air. Air cannot form bubbles of air... it is just air.kilcoo316 wrote:Hardly.manchild wrote:I've put question-mark behind supercavitation, suggesting that the idea of front blown exhaust perhaps might be based on benefits of principle of supercavitation or something similar.
Unless you are proposing they inject plasma ahead of the car to change the medium through which the car's surfaces actually travel... which is what supercavitation is; the boundary layer is formed from air (bubbles), not water, which dramatically reduces skin friction drag.
Nice find. Maybe they send RB6 and RB5 boxes to them and used a pen to mark them!imightbewrong wrote:If you look closely at this image it says RB5 on the edge of the crash-structure, coincidence?nacho wrote:Adam Cooper says it's a 2009 Red Bull gearbox.
http://i.imgur.com/FRk6H.jpg
Look at the difference in the pick up points of the RB6 pull rod on the gear box, so much higher in comparison to an RB5 gear box.H. Zedozil wrote: