Good spot!Formula None wrote:Any idea what the small teardrop shaped fairings are for on the front wing's upper elements?
Maybe something to test front tyre temps?
Good spot!Formula None wrote:Any idea what the small teardrop shaped fairings are for on the front wing's upper elements?
I can agree that a fast movement can disturb the airflow... but for how long? Surely reaching a smooth air flow will take a lot less time than the 0.1 to 0.3 seconds that I lose from using a slow actuator.djos wrote:imo it's more likely that having a "super fast" mechanism disrupts the airflow too much and causes the airflow to detach when activated.
Looks like they would generate a Vortex infront of the break ductsAny idea what the small teardrop shaped fairings are for on the front wing's upper elements?
Exactly, stalling is the aim not increasing down-force so disruption is welcome.RichardHH wrote:I can agree that a fast movement can disturb the airflow... but for how long? Surely reaching a smooth air flow will take a lot less time than the 0.1 to 0.3 seconds that I lose from using a slow actuator.djos wrote:imo it's more likely that having a "super fast" mechanism disrupts the airflow too much and causes the airflow to detach when activated.
What about it? It's been discussed to death already. And the latest Barca test saw them running the smaller more teardrop shaped one.wrcsti wrote:Alll this wing speed talk and noone referencing to the huge hot air exit?
I think if it were purely to create a vortex for the brake ducts, they could easily do that with the shape of the trailing edge, no? It looks to be adjustable, whatever it is.Formula None wrote:Any idea what the small teardrop shaped fairings are for on the front wing's upper elements?
picture
ringo wrote:Exactly, stalling is the aim not increasing down-force so disruption is welcome.RichardHH wrote:I can agree that a fast movement can disturb the airflow... but for how long? Surely reaching a smooth air flow will take a lot less time than the 0.1 to 0.3 seconds that I lose from using a slow actuator.djos wrote:imo it's more likely that having a "super fast" mechanism disrupts the airflow too much and causes the airflow to detach when activated.
What redbull may be doing is having a different wing speed for qualifying than in the race. Seeing as though in qualifying the wing will be stalled in the exit of the turns, it may be of some benefit to have the stall a little slower so downforce is reduced gently as the car is in the process of exiting the turn.
During the race while overtaking in the straights is a different story, that wing may stall as fast and disruptive as mechanically possible.
Using a slower deployment sounds reasonable when opening up, especialy when activating it at a moment where I need good balance. Good thinking Ringo, I didn't considder that. Closing the system is IMHO a different story.SoliRossi wrote:ringo wrote:Exactly, stalling is the aim not increasing down-force so disruption is welcome.RichardHH wrote: I can agree that a fast movement can disturb the airflow... but for how long? Surely reaching a smooth air flow will take a lot less time than the 0.1 to 0.3 seconds that I lose from using a slow actuator.
What redbull may be doing is having a different wing speed for qualifying than in the race. Seeing as though in qualifying the wing will be stalled in the exit of the turns, it may be of some benefit to have the stall a little slower so downforce is reduced gently as the car is in the process of exiting the turn.
During the race while overtaking in the straights is a different story, that wing may stall as fast and disruptive as mechanically possible.
I like ringo's idea. Sounds like a logical and intuitive way to use the wing. Maximise it for each intended use, and lets face it when used in race and quali the goals are very different.
Actually I wonder if the two things are linked. One of the comments, think it may have been scarbs, on the Red Bull said that the size of the duct would disrupt airflow to the rear wing causing it to be less effective, but the trade off was that it would clean up the airflow for the top of the diffuser and beam wing. As the Red Bull rear wing is less effective than that on other cars in terms of overall percentage of downforce being generated, that could also help explain why they are able to activate the ARW earlier than the other cars.wrcsti wrote:Alll this wing speed talk and noone referencing to the huge hot air exit?
no, this is not true.n smikle wrote:Don't forget that if there is nobody 1 second in front of you, you don't get to use the DRS!